Well, I wasn't going to make this confession, because I know that there are mixed opinions on these forums regarding the Survivor show, but that is exactly what I'm applying for. But embarrassed? Hardly. Why not let someone else pay my expenses while I spend two months in some remote wilderness? And stand to win $1,000,000 to boot!
The show has been widely criticized on these forums, but I think that many people have missed the point. True, in many aspects the show has little to do with true survival. The biggest beef that I've seen expressed on the forums has been that the show pits people against each other, whereas in true survival you need to work together. But in almost every post-apocalyptic scenario presented on this very forum there has been an assumption that an "enemy" would be present. To say that the people aspect has nothing to do with survival would be ignorant.
That said, I'd like to mention that while the sociologist in me was intrigued by the personal interaction aspect of the previous games, the outdoorsman in me is even more intrigued by the prospect of being able to test my outdoor skills and see if they are as good as I think they are. If you watch the previews for the upcoming show in Marquesas you'll see that they are no longer being provided food, water, fire or shelter, so true survival will now be a much larger factor than previously.
Sorry for the long reply, s002cjs, but I felt a need to justify my actions among a group that is generally set against the show.
If I make it on I'll try to wear or somehow display my net name (coyotlviejo) so that y'all will know who I am.
Ciao,
cv