- Joined
- Aug 8, 1999
- Messages
- 5,094
I just got it today, so I will only give a quick overview. The Icon is incredibly thin and light, especially considering that this knife is the same size as a large Sebenza or medium Kit Carson Model 4. The company says its dimensions are 3/8" wide and 2.6 oz. I see no reason to doubt either stat. The blade is a spearpoint with a swedge and the steel is 154CM. It has no clip and comes with a leather clip case with a steel clip.
The most distinctive feature of the Icon is its Mattlock mechanism. In short, the Mattlock is a sort of reverse lockblade. Whereas a standard lockblade is disengaged by puushing down, the Mattlock is released by pushing up on an ambidextrious spring. The lock appears to be as secure as one would expect a strong, high-end lockback to be. Unless someone set out to break the lock, I do not see it failing. The problem I have with the Mattlock is that it is actually harder to engage than a standard lockback. Since a standard lock back is lefty friendly, I see no real advantage for the Mattlock. My guess is that William Henry developed the Mattlock so they could market it as new locking mechanism since we knifenuts are suckers for gadgets (hey, they got me to shell out the bucks.) If the Mattlock does have a structural advantage, it would be that it is probably lighter than a similarly sized lockback.
As for the knife itself, I think that the Icon series is betwixt and between. It is marketed as a gents knife, but it really to large for use in a office type of setting unless you know ahead of time that it is knife friendly. The carbon fiber and snakewood Icons would make great work knives for someone who values a light, compact knife. The pearl and abalone models will probably see much more limited use. I also think that the Icon has great tactical potential because of the great clip sheath that comes with. Finally, the Icon should provide competition to the Sebenza as an alternative to those who do not trust or are tired of liner locks.
The most distinctive feature of the Icon is its Mattlock mechanism. In short, the Mattlock is a sort of reverse lockblade. Whereas a standard lockblade is disengaged by puushing down, the Mattlock is released by pushing up on an ambidextrious spring. The lock appears to be as secure as one would expect a strong, high-end lockback to be. Unless someone set out to break the lock, I do not see it failing. The problem I have with the Mattlock is that it is actually harder to engage than a standard lockback. Since a standard lock back is lefty friendly, I see no real advantage for the Mattlock. My guess is that William Henry developed the Mattlock so they could market it as new locking mechanism since we knifenuts are suckers for gadgets (hey, they got me to shell out the bucks.) If the Mattlock does have a structural advantage, it would be that it is probably lighter than a similarly sized lockback.
As for the knife itself, I think that the Icon series is betwixt and between. It is marketed as a gents knife, but it really to large for use in a office type of setting unless you know ahead of time that it is knife friendly. The carbon fiber and snakewood Icons would make great work knives for someone who values a light, compact knife. The pearl and abalone models will probably see much more limited use. I also think that the Icon has great tactical potential because of the great clip sheath that comes with. Finally, the Icon should provide competition to the Sebenza as an alternative to those who do not trust or are tired of liner locks.