- Joined
- May 18, 1999
- Messages
- 15,395
The original question...
I thought I saw a thread with a similar title very early this morning but guess I was mistaken as I couldn't find it when I came back fully awake, just the reference in the other thread, lack of sleep can play funny tricks on your mind.
Uncle Bill told me when I first started here back in '99 that the horn would be the material of choice if you were in the tropical jungle somewhere in the world as it wouldn't rot like wood and he is exactly right!
However the scabbard would probably fail pretty quick due too its materials and method of construction, But in many parts of the world scabbards or sheaths are dayumed near unknown and the knife/tool/weapon is carried exclusively in the hand or bare in a belt or sash.
However the problem with horn is that not many of us live in a tropical jungle or even close to it.
People living near any coast where the humidity is constantly high, or even places like Oklahoma and/or Arkansas, which are considered "Gulf States" according to some sources, have much better luck with the horn than do the people living in drier climates such as desert, like Reno where Uncle Bill resides, or semi-arid areas such as the Eastern part of Oregon and differs places in Eastern Montana and the like which doesn't get much rainfall because of mountain ranges blocking the moisture from coming across.
But with the modern materials we have for preservation wood can stand up just pretty dayumed well to most anything or climate that you want too throw at it.
However wood would be a poor choice for a diving knife as that's an extreme, But horn in this case would be an excellent choice!!!!
I think the horn is a beautiful and very durable material but I prefer it roughed up for a using knife. The reason is that my hands sweat profusely when I'm outside working and the polished horn becomes very slick and insecure for me.
Horn is exactly the same way for me in wet conditions such as a rainy day.
I have never tried too using a waxed horn handle as I just never thought about it, and with horn being the material it is I feel it needs to breathe, but if it was waxed it might do much better.
Everyone using the Hooflex or other Lanolin based material seems too have good luck with the horn. I use the Ballistol on it like I do everything else and have had very good luck with it.
Wood on the other hand IMO is the most versatile material choice that we have available on the khukuris. Even wood that has been severely woodchucked and has a super slick and beautiful finish on it just doesn't get slick and slippery in use as the horn does for me.
However for a strictly using khukuri I prefer a penetrating oil finish and for several reasons....
First of all the more penetrating oil you put on it the deeper it goes until it is protected all the way through.
Second, if the oil finish gets scratched or damaged in almost any way it is easily repairable by rubbing more oil on it. Dings can usually be steamed out with a damp cloth and a hot iron.
Third, wood is a very non slick or slippery material and is easy too hang onto in the most severe conditions.
Fourth, IMO wood is the most beautiful of the two materials as it comes in many shades of color and detail of grain.
Fifth, well oiled wood is almost impervious to wet and rot and once properly treated needs little maintenance other than an occasional treatment with more oil.
Well oiled gunstocks held up very well in the jungle enviroments of WW II.
On a personal note I treated my wood Foxy Folly handle with Ballistol and a little boiled linseed oil, but mostly the Ballistol.
The Ballistol gave the wood a very nice semi-gloss finish that appears not too have a finish on it.
When we get the 17" Foxy Follys in I'm going to do my two the same exact way I did my large one.
Taken from another thread as I feel the question deserves a thread of it's own since the question is asked so often...namaarie said:Hey, guys,
Should I order the horn or wood handles? What are the pros/cons of each? Either one more problematic. Remember I live in Iowa, which means a harsh mix of humidity in summer and bone-dry in winter. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Thanks!
I thought I saw a thread with a similar title very early this morning but guess I was mistaken as I couldn't find it when I came back fully awake, just the reference in the other thread, lack of sleep can play funny tricks on your mind.

Yup, all comes down to personal preferences, sort of.munk said:Horn has different handling characteristics. Some say it sticks to their hands better, some say wood does.
munk



Uncle Bill told me when I first started here back in '99 that the horn would be the material of choice if you were in the tropical jungle somewhere in the world as it wouldn't rot like wood and he is exactly right!
However the scabbard would probably fail pretty quick due too its materials and method of construction, But in many parts of the world scabbards or sheaths are dayumed near unknown and the knife/tool/weapon is carried exclusively in the hand or bare in a belt or sash.

However the problem with horn is that not many of us live in a tropical jungle or even close to it.

People living near any coast where the humidity is constantly high, or even places like Oklahoma and/or Arkansas, which are considered "Gulf States" according to some sources, have much better luck with the horn than do the people living in drier climates such as desert, like Reno where Uncle Bill resides, or semi-arid areas such as the Eastern part of Oregon and differs places in Eastern Montana and the like which doesn't get much rainfall because of mountain ranges blocking the moisture from coming across.
But with the modern materials we have for preservation wood can stand up just pretty dayumed well to most anything or climate that you want too throw at it.
However wood would be a poor choice for a diving knife as that's an extreme, But horn in this case would be an excellent choice!!!!



I think the horn is a beautiful and very durable material but I prefer it roughed up for a using knife. The reason is that my hands sweat profusely when I'm outside working and the polished horn becomes very slick and insecure for me.
Horn is exactly the same way for me in wet conditions such as a rainy day.
I have never tried too using a waxed horn handle as I just never thought about it, and with horn being the material it is I feel it needs to breathe, but if it was waxed it might do much better.
Everyone using the Hooflex or other Lanolin based material seems too have good luck with the horn. I use the Ballistol on it like I do everything else and have had very good luck with it.
Wood on the other hand IMO is the most versatile material choice that we have available on the khukuris. Even wood that has been severely woodchucked and has a super slick and beautiful finish on it just doesn't get slick and slippery in use as the horn does for me.
However for a strictly using khukuri I prefer a penetrating oil finish and for several reasons....
First of all the more penetrating oil you put on it the deeper it goes until it is protected all the way through.
Second, if the oil finish gets scratched or damaged in almost any way it is easily repairable by rubbing more oil on it. Dings can usually be steamed out with a damp cloth and a hot iron.
Third, wood is a very non slick or slippery material and is easy too hang onto in the most severe conditions.
Fourth, IMO wood is the most beautiful of the two materials as it comes in many shades of color and detail of grain.
Fifth, well oiled wood is almost impervious to wet and rot and once properly treated needs little maintenance other than an occasional treatment with more oil.
Well oiled gunstocks held up very well in the jungle enviroments of WW II.
On a personal note I treated my wood Foxy Folly handle with Ballistol and a little boiled linseed oil, but mostly the Ballistol.
The Ballistol gave the wood a very nice semi-gloss finish that appears not too have a finish on it.
When we get the 17" Foxy Follys in I'm going to do my two the same exact way I did my large one.
