Woodsman Pro

Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
650
I picked up a woodsman pro and was excited. The grind turned out to be very off which a slight roll (I think). I used the Worksharp precision to try and even it out but I spent hours with no results. It was the s35vn model. Luckily I could return it through Amazon but still was disappointed. Not in Buck but the fact that this angle couldn’t be reworked. I’m not a master sharpener by any means but this weird roll would not come out.
Don’t know if I should try another S35vn steel or the good old 420HC. The 420 would be easier to rework.
 
Buck's 420HC serves my purposes quite well. In my opinion, (which you didn't actually ask for) I don't realize the benefit of the upgraded steel at the increased price.
That’s what I was starting to figure. The knife is such a great size for picnics and small hikes that the 420 is more than enough. And saves half the cost.
 
That’s unfortunate that the knife came with a bad grind. That un-fixable roll sounds strange and frustrating.

Whatever you decide to go for, either another Pro or a standard version, I hope it comes already dialed-in!
 
That’s unfortunate that the knife came with a bad grind. That un-fixable roll sounds strange and frustrating.

Whatever you decide to go for, either another Pro or a standard version, I hope it comes already dialed-in!
I wasn’t disappointed in Buck, I’ve returned other blades from big name brands for bad edges. It was a weird roll, but I’m very new to knives so maybe I missed something.
I did pick up a 420 version which was great for a picnic lunch with the wife and kids. Cut up sandwiches like nobody’s business.


Now I have an itch for the 105 pro
 
I say go for the 420hc. I like that it’s tougher, easy to sharpen, and cost efficient. Nothing wrong with s35vn, it’s just not my favorite.
I like that it’s easier to work with. Plus if I lost it, I’d only be out $74. I also like the look of the D2 models with the wood handles.
 
I also think it would be a great travel fixed blade but I know places have a problem with 4” blades.
 
I wasn’t disappointed in Buck, I’ve returned other blades from big name brands for bad edges. It was a weird roll, but I’m very new to knives so maybe I missed something.
I did pick up a 420 version which was great for a picnic lunch with the wife and kids. Cut up sandwiches like nobody’s business.


Now I have an itch for the 105 pro
Nice, I hope it serves you well!
 
I say go for the 420hc. I like that it’s tougher, easy to sharpen, and cost efficient. Nothing wrong with s35vn, it’s just not my favorite.
Buck’s 420HC has always done well by me. For over seven years I’ve used it throughout daily life. Carried my 119 from when I was 16 years old until I recently bought a 124, which is what I carry now.

Great performance, and extraordinary corrosion resistance. I’ve been on many hikes where the weather turned bad, and have never once had any rust on my 119, even after hours of hiking through heavy rains. I’ve had my Becker BK2 develop rust after a mere half hour of doing yard work in the rain. Not a big deal, but it is a nice luxury to not have to even think about keeping a knife dry while doing stuff.
 
Buck’s 420HC has always done well by me. For over seven years I’ve used it throughout daily life. Carried my 119 from when I was 16 years old until I recently bought a 124, which is what I carry now.

Great performance, and extraordinary corrosion resistance. I’ve been on many hikes where the weather turned bad, and have never once had any rust on my 119, even after hours of hiking through heavy rains. I’ve had my Becker BK2 develop rust after a mere half hour of doing yard work in the rain. Not a big deal, but it is a nice luxury to not have to even think about keeping a knife dry while doing stuff.
I agree. I really love my carbon steels, carry one daily, but I really wish that my ESEE’s and Becker’s were made with Buck’s 420hc heat treat.
 
Back
Top