Yet another (?) stove thread

dogboye

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 23, 1999
Messages
7,149
I'm pretty sure there have been similar threads, but I'm hoping to get specific suggestions/opinions on some particular stoves. I am looking for a backpacking stove that will burn multiple fuels, and must at least include auto gas. Preferably it will also burn some of the more common canister fuels (like the Coleman propane canisters at the local Wal-Mart), but this is just gravy if it does. I have narrowed down my search to the following, in roughly this order, and would be interested in any opinions.

Also, as an aside, if anyone lives in the Moab area, I have a question regarding availability of fuels in town.

  • Primus Omni-fuel (burns all liquid and canister fuels - including jet fuel, as if I could find that :rolleyes: ; may nest in my cookpot), $130
  • Primus Multi-fuel (burns all canister except butane, plus all liquid fuels including jet fuel; may nest) $99
  • MSR Dragonfly (burns all liquid fuels, and will nest in my cookpot), $100
  • Primus Himalaya Vari-fuel (burns all liquid fuels including jet fuel, and may nest), $65
  • MSR XGK Expedition (burns all liquid fuels, and has a long history, but has zero chance of nesting in anything I have), $110
  • Optimus Nova Multi-fuel (burns all liquid fuels and may nest), $130
    [/list=a]

    Due to bad experiences in the past, I am not considering any of the MSR series that has the stacked-disk burner assembly. I don't think they are Murphy'd well enough.

    {EDIT} Also, I don't think I'm interested in alcohol stoves, as I don't think their lightness and simplicity outweighs their lack of heat output .
 
I doubt this is the sort of stove you would be interested in, but I found it while browsing the internet.

Has anyone used one of these stoves? are they as good as the makers claim? I would think lighting the thing might take awhile, but if you were outdoors for long periods using wood for fuel might make sense.





http://www.trailstove.com/details.html
 
Interesting stove. Thing is, I wonder if the "backpackers' grill" isn't even lighter. Basically just a grill that has some folding legs that you can use over any fire ring. I know the Sierra stove is well liked by some people, and would seem to be a very similar concept. Thing is, I wonder just how much wood IS available in, say, the canyons of Arizona or Utah. I've never been there, but that is where I'm headed that I'm now looking to buy a stove. But in any case, like I said, interesting idea. That I will consider. Thanks for the link. And at least replying. :rolleyes: Sorta surprised that there hasn't been more opinions.
 
Originally posted by rockspyder
...I wonder if the "backpackers' grill" isn't even lighter. Basically just a grill that has some folding legs that you can use over any fire ring. I know the Sierra stove is well liked by some people, and would seem to be a very similar concept. Thing is, I wonder just how much wood IS available in, say, the canyons of Arizona or Utah.
In the desert Southwest you will find pinon, scrubby (by Northwest standards ;) ) cedars, fir & other pine trees, oaks in some areas, and often cottonwoods along the rivers. You could probably also use sagebrush branches for burning, although I haven't tried the sagebrush myself.

Aluminum backpacker grills are indeed lightweight. They don't offer protection to your fire from the wind. IMHO it's not terribly hard to rig a small rockwall or log windbreak and/or use some heavy duty aluminum foil around the grill legs for that. My feeling is that they are okay for car camping, but don't give a lot of added functionality over using a small fire ring for backpacking.

For those who haven't seen it yet, here's a link to the Sierra stove manufacturer's site. http://www.zzstove.com/ The stove is basically a fire combustion chamber with forced ventilation provided by a small battery-powered fan. I'm tempted by their titanium version. 10 ounces for a camping stove that you don't have to pack around fuel to put in it is pretty sweet. But I find the $125 price tag tough to swallow, so haven't gotten one yet. If I find some thin titanium sheet at Boeing surplus just down the road I may take a shot at faking my own version for less. :)
 
Between the Sierra and the stove that jacknife posted, I'd probably be more tempted by jacknife's. Heck of a lot cheaper, to burn the same fuel.

I've thought about it a lot since originally posting, and I'm leaning toward the Primus Multi-fuel. Most likely. The MSR Dragonfly may get the nod as I plae the order... never know. Problem is, I would have to order the "Multi-fuel" direct from the manufacturer. If I get the Dragonfly, I can get it from REI, essentially free because of my kick-back (dividend). DANG! Can't decide.....
 
From reading the backpacker ,over the years you picked some good stoves , I use the Coleman apex 2 for 8 years now ,still going strong.. that is my main stove for the back country for my family of 4 it burns white gas,unleaded gas,and kero but you have to change the generator to burn kero. On bushwacking trips I use the zip stove that burns wood ,pine cones,anything burnable (great little stove)it boils 1qt of water in about 4 mins and weighs about 1 lb great for on the move.. I'm looking into the primus line my self good luck :) Chow ,Mark
 
OwenM, that is an awesome review site. Best thing I've seen for reviews since Bladeforums and Knifeforums. Thanks for the link. I looked at the Ultralight, but will probably have to pass on it. The price is a little more than I'd like to spend.

I may have to take a look at that Coleman, Mark. About how much do they run? Is it the same type burner as the Primus and the Dragonfly? In other words, not the stacked disk?

Thanks for the replies, guys.
 
Glad you like that site.
That (two hundred freaking dollars!) UltraLight isn't my UltraLight. Had to go look after you commented on the price...
I just seem to remember that being in the name of mine. Not sure what model it is. I paid ~$30-40, IIRC.
 
Originally posted by OwenM
Glad you like that site.
That (two hundred freaking dollars!) UltraLight isn't my UltraLight. Had to go look after you commented on the price...
I just seem to remember that being in the name of mine. Not sure what model it is. I paid ~$30-40, IIRC.

Ahhhh...OK. I was pretty impressed with your ... um... er... shall we say dedication to the outdoor cooking arts. ;)

I think the only way I could justify that Ultralight to myself would be if I was regularly lugging gear up the face of El Capitan. That is a lot o' money for a stove (I say, as I don't blink an eye at some of the custom knives I've bought :rolleyes: ). :) The more I read, though, the more I'm leaning toward the Primus Multi-fuel, or Vari-fuel. I'm really glad you sent the link, after I started reading some of the reviews of the Dragonfly. Sounds like it is more than a bit problematic. Hmph, almost moreso than the Whisperlite (which I don't like because of the stacked-disk arrangement). Or maybe my friend should have never taken that assembly apart?
 
Why do you really want a multi-fuel stove? A gas/kerosene combo should do everything you need. Flying with a stove on a commercial
Aircraft is a trick,if they know you have a stove you can't take it.
In the U.S. I have never found a place where you couldn't get Coleman
type fuel or kerosene if you needed it. The L.P. stoves are much more difficult to find canisters for.
Primus makes a great L.P. stove and it is very light weight and cheap. You already know about M.S.R. stoves. Buy both and leave the one at the trail head in your car that you don't have fuel for. <><
 
:( Bummer rock, the apex II has stacked disks and is about $65 . what problems with the disk style did you have? I once over flowed a pot and put the flame ,:eek: but it was very easy to disasemble and clean ,one good note the stove simmers great.. good luck ! Mark
 
Originally posted by frediver
Why do you really want a multi-fuel stove? A gas/kerosene combo should do everything you need. Flying with a stove on a commercial aircraft is a trick,if they know you have a stove you can't take it.
In the U.S. I have never found a place where you couldn't get Coleman type fuel or kerosene if you needed it. The L.P. stoves are much more difficult to find canisters for.
Primus makes a great L.P. stove and it is very light weight and cheap. You already know about M.S.R. stoves. Buy both and leave the one at the trail head in your car that you don't have fuel for.

Not sure what you're saying. For the price of "both," I could buy one that burns both, and not leave any behind? :confused:

Also, you bring up an interesting point. I have heard people say before that you couldn't take a stove in your checked luggage. Where do you get this information? I just checked both the FAA and the airline that I'll be flying, and no mention of stoves. They go into great detail with lighters, and combustible substances, including "flammable solids and liquids." But, no mention of stoves. I have heard some say that you can take a stove but not the fuel (obviously), other say that you can take a stove that has never been used, and still others like you say that you can't take a stove, period. Do you have personal experience with this?

I plan on calling the airline and asking them directly, but so far I've ended up on hold for so long that I gave up. Worst case, I will send the hazardous stuff general delivery to the PO. No problem there, as long as I declare it so they ship it ground (and get it in the mail soon enough).

On to the particular questions. I want the multi-fuel exactly because I don't know what types of fuel will be available where I'm going. It is supposedly way out in the middle of nowhere. Theoretically, since I'll be flying into an airport in that region of the country, then driving a substantial distance, i could stop on the way and pick up white gas. Theoretically. As for the canister capability, it's not that important. But, if I'm buying a stove in that range, I might as well go for the extra capability. BUT, getting the cheaper stove is definitely something to consider.

As far as the disk assembly, I believe it is too easy to screw up. A friend and I went backpacking for a couple of days on the AT a few years ago. He had a Whisperlite that he had used many times, one that he had finally had to clean. He cleaned it the day before departure, and didn't fire it up afterward to make sure everything was working right. So we get out on the trail and that evening he goes to fire it up so we can make dinner. Well, after priming it, it wouldn't light. So he primes it again. Still wouldn't catch. Dumps a bunch of fuel in to prime it. Still won't catch. Starts fiddling with the disks, the orientation of them to each other, then primes again. This time, it catches, but will only put out a meager flame. Maybe 3 candles' worth. We were looking at a hungry night, except since we were at a shelter, a group of people there let us use their Coleman twin burner camp stove! These guys had actually packed that thing in. Along with a bunch of canned goods, fresh vegetables, and cookware. These guys wanted to eat right. And they were glad to get rid of the food so they didn't have to pack it all back out the next day.

So anyway, my friend and I head home that day, bailing early. Not directly due to the stove, but it did factor into the decision. If other things had been going well, we would have toughed it out. Anyway, he goes home and takes the thing apart again, figuring that he had screwed up the orientation of the disks. After working on it an evening, he figures he has it together correctly and tries firing it up. It works much better.

So, the next time he goes out, he is with other people, I'm not along. But I get word back later that the stove was now doing the same thing again. I think he worked on it again and got it working again. But he never trusted it as his sole source again. Incidentally, he also made sure that all the fuel lines, gaskets, pump, and the rest were hooked up correctly and not leaking, and that the jets and such were clean. And it wasn't losing pressure (except through the burner that wouldn't burn). The only thing he could figure was the burner stack. Soooo... I'd just as soon not start dealing with that. I'd rather pay the extra bucks for a burner that won't simmer. :)
 
I just made a long reply and lost it. This is the short version.
I just don't care for M.S.R. stoves I don't like the fuel bottle setup. I also think you will be spending more than you need to to have a option you likely will not use. I think it will be more difficult to find kerosene than white gas. Coleman fuel is everywhere.
At least in the U.S.
As for flying I think I would ask at backer mag. I think the problem will be on your return. Getting there with a clean stove should be easy. Once you put fuel in it, it will smell. They could think explosive vapors or worse. I have no 1st hand knowledge. Like you it's what i hear.
Finding any kind of fuel in Moab should not be a problem. It's just to popular a place for campers of all kinds.
I just checked tonight,REI has the old model of the yellowstone
L.P. stove on sale for $19.93.
My main reason for having two stoves is that I have two stoves and likely one of them will work. and sometimes when hiking with a friend we take both. We cook with my old Seva123 and keep things warm with the L.P. stove. It just depends how quick we need to eat or how lazy we are. what ever stove you get remember to get a wind screen.
Don't buy the M.S.R. wind screen, go to a hardware store and get some vally tin(aluminium) use this for your wind screen, (M.S.R. does)
Don't let your stove get to hot behind the screen or it will explode,or at least vent a great big fireball!<><
 
Thanks for the words of wisdom, frediver. I think I understand now.

I did a lot of checking yesterday after you posted. On both the FAA and United websites, all I could find was warnings against carrying fuel. On the FAA site, I found a regulatory instruction that said care check out camping equipment because it might contain combustible solids or liquids. It certainly didn't say anything more than that.

I already have one canister stove, so I guess I should probably just can the idea of adding that capability to the stove I'm buying. Especially considering the redundancy. Besides, I imagine any place that has canister fuel is going to have Coleman white gas fuel. :rolleyes: Right? I definitely want the kerosene and auto fuel options, though, because I emailed an acquaintance from a Jeep list that goes to Moab on occasion. She said that the town was very small, and only had MOM&POP stores. So, it would likely be limited in the camping fuels they would have. I don't want to get out there with a stove that I had to leavee the fuel behind, and find out I can't get any fuel for it. Better safe than sorry, especially since it is a minimal extra charge over just white-gas stoves (typically $15 I believe), and I'm travelling 3/4 of the way across the country to go camping. :rolleyes:

Oh and thanks again for the advice. I wouldn't want a fireball. :D
 
It is my recollection from years ago that a fire safety instructor informed the class (I was not in the class) that a full can of gasoline has less explosive power than a used empty one. Considering that one of the most powerful non-nuclear bombs in our arsenal uses some sort of fuel spray/vapor system---remember the gulf war and more recent reports--I guess this makes sense.

If the tank is noncorrosive, perhaps it would be acceptable if cleaned and filled with water. Of course that leaves a wasted disposal problem...and you cannot safely wash gasoline down the sink....

I always wonder how people safely get their gear to the places they go.

Alcohol might pass, but that is not the kind of cooking power you are talking about. Since it is not as volatile, it is not as effective. After reading the above, perhaps I will stick to alcohol ;)
 
Originally posted by Donald
Considering that one of the most powerful non-nuclear bombs in our arsenal uses some sort of fuel spray/vapor system---remember the gulf war and more recent reports--I guess this makes sense.

Are you talking about the fuel-air explosive thing, that we dropped out the back of a C-130, and weighs upwards of what, 15,000 pounds? :eek: I think that thing is actually powered by aluminum powder. Trying to find the reference right now, but having trouble.

Here it is. Man, I can't believe all this information is available in an open site on the internet. What are these guys thinking?

BTW, I've pretty much decided to go with the Primus Vari-fuel, instead of the Multi. Not positive, but pretty sure.
 
What I had in part referred to is here http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/fae.htm

A Fuel/Air Explosive (FAE)
:eek:

From the same web sight, but a diferent nasty weapon.
______________

Good luck with your stove! You might want to check out this site:
http://www.spiritburner.com/
They have a discussion forum. There is also a lot of discussion of this subject either on some of the ultralight backpacking sites and outdoor magazines, or links to follow that are listed there.
 
I had to cut it short before. I also saw some reviews of stoves on the Hoodlums forum, but it was a while ago. My time sense is poor, but perhaps around the end of last year?? A few time trials of a couple different stoves, the sierra stove, alcohol stoves perhaps, etc. I do not recall if the wings alcohol stove site has info on other types, although I know it has info on a hobo stove.
 
Thanks Donald. I'll try to check out those sites before I buy.

Hey, what are those knives in your avatar? One or two look like maybe some Simonich knives.
 
Back
Top