I have noticed recently that there seems to be two opposing points of view on the applications which one can reasonably expect to use a knife for.
One group feels that knives are for cutting, and that any usage outside of this is abusive and improper.
The other group thinks that knives should be able to function in many additional capacities, such as pry bar or hatchet. If a knive is not overbuilt enough to be put to extreme rough usage then it is judged to be unsuitable for carry.
Personally, I think that both of these views are a bit extreme.
I do believe that a good knife (even a folder) should be usable for more than just cutting. If one is only interested in efficient seperation of material then an Olfa or Stanley razor knife would work better than any more expensive blade. In my experience there have been a number of times when having a blade which could withstand light usage as a prying or scraping tool has made a significant difference in the ease with which a task could be completed. I don't mean cutting doors off of a Buick or peeling rocks, but things like opening cans or working on an unanticipated repair or similar project which requires more than just simple cutting. Having the right tool for the job is nice, but sometimes the situation makes that impossible.
I also think that expecting a knife to serve as a regular effective replacement for a wrecking bar or hammer is too extreme. Certainly there are knives that can do this, but significant compromises are required to make it happen; and frequently these compromises decrease the overall effectiveness of the knife as a cutting instrument. In automotive terms, you can buy a H1 or Defender if you really do need to perform some heavy duty off roading, but to say that an Accord is an inferior car because it can't pull stumps and climb mountains is unreasonable. It is simply built for a different usage. I suppose there are some limted applications where being able to put a folder in a bench vise and break a stick on the back of the blade could be useful, but in everyday usage these are rare to nonexistant.
I guess everybody takes a bit of each approach to their own choices, it's just a matter of where you want to draw the line. Some are happy with a thin slipjoint, others want a sharpened baseball bat. Personally I'm somewhere in the middle. I expect efficient cutting, and some limited degree of other usefulness.
What do you think, and where do you stand on this spectrum?
One group feels that knives are for cutting, and that any usage outside of this is abusive and improper.
The other group thinks that knives should be able to function in many additional capacities, such as pry bar or hatchet. If a knive is not overbuilt enough to be put to extreme rough usage then it is judged to be unsuitable for carry.
Personally, I think that both of these views are a bit extreme.
I do believe that a good knife (even a folder) should be usable for more than just cutting. If one is only interested in efficient seperation of material then an Olfa or Stanley razor knife would work better than any more expensive blade. In my experience there have been a number of times when having a blade which could withstand light usage as a prying or scraping tool has made a significant difference in the ease with which a task could be completed. I don't mean cutting doors off of a Buick or peeling rocks, but things like opening cans or working on an unanticipated repair or similar project which requires more than just simple cutting. Having the right tool for the job is nice, but sometimes the situation makes that impossible.
I also think that expecting a knife to serve as a regular effective replacement for a wrecking bar or hammer is too extreme. Certainly there are knives that can do this, but significant compromises are required to make it happen; and frequently these compromises decrease the overall effectiveness of the knife as a cutting instrument. In automotive terms, you can buy a H1 or Defender if you really do need to perform some heavy duty off roading, but to say that an Accord is an inferior car because it can't pull stumps and climb mountains is unreasonable. It is simply built for a different usage. I suppose there are some limted applications where being able to put a folder in a bench vise and break a stick on the back of the blade could be useful, but in everyday usage these are rare to nonexistant.
I guess everybody takes a bit of each approach to their own choices, it's just a matter of where you want to draw the line. Some are happy with a thin slipjoint, others want a sharpened baseball bat. Personally I'm somewhere in the middle. I expect efficient cutting, and some limited degree of other usefulness.
What do you think, and where do you stand on this spectrum?