kel_aa said:
I also think it is backwards that the knife manufactures for the most part need "new" steels to make "improvements".
Better steels allow for better designs, unfortunately in many cases the materials are often not better for specific designs. There is a common misconceptions that certain steels are just better overall, pick up any tool steel book and this is obviously wrong, they were all developed for a reason.
You first look towards the performance required, then determine the geometry which creates it and lastly find the steel which has the best set of properties to match it. Guys like Wilson do this which is why he offers steels from 420HC to S125V and both of them are "better" for certain knives depending on what the user wants.
Back to ZDP-189, I have been meaning to compare it to S30V and SPGS. I want to do a cardboard run first as it is pretty standard but have as of yet just not got enough material as all of these materials can be expected to cut a lot. I am waiting for roughly 50 m for the first run, and this means I need 50*5*3 so 3/4 of a km of similar weight.
Spyderco has released some CATRA data on ZDP-189 and it is very high, improved over S30V for example and this should well represent its slicing edge retention on abrasive media at moderate edge angles. Of course there is also push cutting edge retention and low angle performance.
I would like to see the actual perspective in detail of the Japanese high chromium viewpoint vs the Crucible vanadium based steels for cutlery. Specifically I would like to know the carbide composition of ZDP-189 after heat treatement, what are the size of the chroimum carbides compared to the vanadium carbides in S30/S90V.
-Cliff