It looks like im gonna be in the fortunate position that i can sell some books for good money wich gives me the oportunity to buy a quality knife. Living in Holland i cant seem to get my hands on much of the great knives that are made in the US but we do have our fair share of great knives.
Im pondering for almost two weeks now about the decision to go for the zero tolerance 0300 BW or the extrema ratio mpc. they are around the same price range. ZT 365 euro and ER 400 euro..so i think they are both quite expensive knives and that i should expect to get some real quality.
So i would like some more opinions about this choice...is it correct to say "they are both flawless knives and you should just buy the one that appeals to me fysically?"
Or is there more than meets the eye.
maybe its important to tell why i buy knives in the first place.
I buy knives from the more expensive pricerange because they give me the impression that you can realy depend on them when s**t hits the fan. But in real life i just enjoy them for being there...i cary them and take great care of them, talk about them with friends etc. i only use them for light work ( opening packages and so fort) but i dont care for a knife when it doesnt give me the "feel" of holding a life saving solidness. so i do not use them for heavy chores but i want them to be able to fullfill those chores IF needed.
so is there anyone who has an opinion on do's and donts regarding thse two knives...im not here for the attention im realy going back and forth on my decisions, looking at them on internet and just cant decide wich one to choose.
I like them both in apperance equally ...i think the thickness of the ER blade is a plus but i do not know if the locking mechanism of either one is better than the other.
I like a heavy folder that can work as a prybar as well...ive seen the ZT function just fine in that area , didnt find any hard testings of a extrema ratio pmc so far.
so im curious about your opinions...it will be the most expensive knife i have ever bought.
i do have fixed blades already thet can perform heavy duty so recommendation for those is not needed.
kind regards
robin
Im pondering for almost two weeks now about the decision to go for the zero tolerance 0300 BW or the extrema ratio mpc. they are around the same price range. ZT 365 euro and ER 400 euro..so i think they are both quite expensive knives and that i should expect to get some real quality.
So i would like some more opinions about this choice...is it correct to say "they are both flawless knives and you should just buy the one that appeals to me fysically?"
Or is there more than meets the eye.
maybe its important to tell why i buy knives in the first place.
I buy knives from the more expensive pricerange because they give me the impression that you can realy depend on them when s**t hits the fan. But in real life i just enjoy them for being there...i cary them and take great care of them, talk about them with friends etc. i only use them for light work ( opening packages and so fort) but i dont care for a knife when it doesnt give me the "feel" of holding a life saving solidness. so i do not use them for heavy chores but i want them to be able to fullfill those chores IF needed.
so is there anyone who has an opinion on do's and donts regarding thse two knives...im not here for the attention im realy going back and forth on my decisions, looking at them on internet and just cant decide wich one to choose.
I like them both in apperance equally ...i think the thickness of the ER blade is a plus but i do not know if the locking mechanism of either one is better than the other.
I like a heavy folder that can work as a prybar as well...ive seen the ZT function just fine in that area , didnt find any hard testings of a extrema ratio pmc so far.
so im curious about your opinions...it will be the most expensive knife i have ever bought.
i do have fixed blades already thet can perform heavy duty so recommendation for those is not needed.
kind regards
robin