BG42EDGE
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2009
- Messages
- 7,593
On the old Woolrich hunting coats the left-hand breast pocket was covered by a flap and it had some compartments that were probably intended to hold a few spare cartridges.
It was handy because the Buck 444 fit one of those little slots tight and stayed perfectly. Always smart to have a small spare.
I think the 110 is justifiably getting a lot of support here--not because it does everything perfectly, but because it's light and compact on your belt and it does almost everything very, very well.
The 119, not so much. Great design, big and strong, looks good on the belt when camping......but gutting deer? Not so good......big, thick, wide and not handy.
And clip blade vs. drop point? The problem there is that people who haven't really gutted a lot of deer think the gut is so fragile that you just have to touch it with a blade to get a surge of toxic waste spurting out and spoiling your meat. Actually, the gut is fairly tough and you have to be pretty clumsy and ham-handed to get yourself into trouble that way.
Good discussion.
It was handy because the Buck 444 fit one of those little slots tight and stayed perfectly. Always smart to have a small spare.
I think the 110 is justifiably getting a lot of support here--not because it does everything perfectly, but because it's light and compact on your belt and it does almost everything very, very well.
The 119, not so much. Great design, big and strong, looks good on the belt when camping......but gutting deer? Not so good......big, thick, wide and not handy.
And clip blade vs. drop point? The problem there is that people who haven't really gutted a lot of deer think the gut is so fragile that you just have to touch it with a blade to get a surge of toxic waste spurting out and spoiling your meat. Actually, the gut is fairly tough and you have to be pretty clumsy and ham-handed to get yourself into trouble that way.
Good discussion.
Last edited: