1700's trapping techniques

Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
610
So, I've been reading a book about David Thompson's travels through North America in the late 1700's/early 1800's. Essentially, he was a surveyor who worked from the western shore of Hudson's Bay following the fur trade, and eventually wound up mapping the length of the Columbia River to the Pacific coast. I grew up on the river that bears his name, although he likely never set eyes on it. He was one of the earliest to document the techniques and lifestyle of the natives around the Foothills of the eastern Rockies (western Alberta) when the horse was still a novelty. He documented a couple of interesting trapping techniques I thought I'd share...

On catching eagles and hawks:

"...the natives made shallow pits which they covered in slender willows and grass under which they lay, with a large piece of meat opposite their breasts; thus arranged they patiently await the flight of the eagle, which is first seen very high, scaling in rude circles, but gradually lowering, till at length he seems determined to pounce upon the meat, his descent is then very swift, with claws extended, the moment he touches the meat the Indians grasp his two legs in his hands, and dashes him through the slender willows into the bottom of the pit and strikes his head until he is dead"

A rabbit snare as set across one of their runs in the snow:

"...across which a hedge is thrown of pine [spruce] trees of close branches, but cut away at the path; a long pole is tied to a tree, in such a manner that the butt end shall over-balance the upper end and the weight of the hare; to this [upper] end a snare of brass wire is tied by a piece of strong twine; this end of the pole is tied to the tree laid across the path by a slip knot, and the snare suspended four inches above the snow. The hare comes bounding along, enters the snare, the slip knot is undone, the top end is free, the butt end by its weight descends, and Puss is suspended by the snare about six to eight feet above the surface of the snow. This height is required to prevent them being taken by foxes and martens"

The book is David Thompson: Travels in Western North America 1784-1812, edited by Victor G. Hopwood. It's part naturalist, part travel diary and trade journal, part anthropology, and a good read IMO for anyone interested in paleolithic techniques (once you get past Thompson's sentence structure and unconventional use of punctuation, even for that time period).
 
So, I've been reading a book about David Thompson's travels through North America in the late 1700's/early 1800's. Essentially, he was a surveyor who worked from the western shore of Hudson's Bay following the fur trade, and eventually wound up mapping the length of the Columbia River to the Pacific coast. I grew up on the river that bears his name, although he likely never set eyes on it. He was one of the earliest to document the techniques and lifestyle of the natives around the Foothills of the eastern Rockies (western Alberta) when the horse was still a novelty. He documented a couple of interesting trapping techniques I thought I'd share...

On catching eagles and hawks:

"...the natives made shallow pits which they covered in slender willows and grass under which they lay, with a large piece of meat opposite their breasts; thus arranged they patiently await the flight of the eagle, which is first seen very high, scaling in rude circles, but gradually lowering, till at length he seems determined to pounce upon the meat, his descent is then very swift, with claws extended, the moment he touches the meat the Indians grasp his two legs in his hands, and dashes him through the slender willows into the bottom of the pit and strikes his head until he is dead"

A rabbit snare as set across one of their runs in the snow:

"...across which a hedge is thrown of pine [spruce] trees of close branches, but cut away at the path; a long pole is tied to a tree, in such a manner that the butt end shall over-balance the upper end and the weight of the hare; to this [upper] end a snare of brass wire is tied by a piece of strong twine; this end of the pole is tied to the tree laid across the path by a slip knot, and the snare suspended four inches above the snow. The hare comes bounding along, enters the snare, the slip knot is undone, the top end is free, the butt end by its weight descends, and Puss is suspended by the snare about six to eight feet above the surface of the snow. This height is required to prevent them being taken by foxes and martens"

The book is David Thompson: Travels in Western North America 1784-1812, edited by Victor G. Hopwood. It's part naturalist, part travel diary and trade journal, part anthropology, and a good read IMO for anyone interested in paleolithic techniques (once you get past Thompson's sentence structure and unconventional use of punctuation, even for that time period).

Hey Deadeye, good post. What year was that book (the one you're reading) published?

Doc
 
The rabbit snare using a slip knot is illustrated on page 274 of Kochansky's BUSHCRAFT.
 
Catching an eagle by putting bait on your chest, then waiting for it to dive bomb you, then grabbing the talons and kill the bird? FICTION. enough said.
 
XD Shooter- you mis read this. The bait is on a platform of willow rods, the hunter in underneath. THe eagle does not contact the hunter- he is seized from below while he is on the bait.
 
The snare wire across the rabbit hole actually works, believe it or not!:thumbup:
 
Baiting a thin platform above you with meat... hmmm... what if a bear or wolf or cougar beats the eagle to the bait?
 
Baiting a thin platform above you with meat... hmmm... what if a bear or wolf or cougar beats the eagle to the bait?


Simple enough. As with the eagle, you just grab the bear, wolf, or Mountain lion by the hind feet and dash his brains out on a rock or log. :thumbup:

L.W.
 
Baiting a thin platform above you with meat... hmmm... what if a bear or wolf or cougar beats the eagle to the bait?

I did read about a grizzly bear finding an eagle hunter in his pit , dragged him out and killed him. It might have been one of the Andy Russell books or James Willard Schultz.

Here is a resource of old books concerning the fur trade , exploration etc . David Thompson is under " Narrative 1784-1812 "

http://eir.library.utoronto.ca/champlain/browse_list.cfm?lang=eng&browsetype=Subject
 
Thanks for the link Pentlatch. That appears to be scans of the source material that Hopwood editted into a single volume. I can see myself doing a lot of reading there - great resource !

In the book, he describes foxes as being the most common 'thief', sometimes making the hunters get up and move. Apparently they reused the same pits on top of knolls season after season.

Reading it myself, I couldn't help but think of it from a bear's point of view: the meat is just appetizer before the main course which is served in a bowl !
 
I recall reading a story about a guy trying to get a man-eating cat (tiger or leopard I think). He crouched in a hole with his gun. The hole was covered with a big spoked wagon wheel as I recall....and there was bait nearby. Sure enough, the cat comes along but the dude finds that the hole isn't big enough to rotate his gun from muzzle down to muzzle up and shoot the cat. I think the cat even reached down between the spokes but didn't manage to connect seriously.

Jim Corbett was the hunter/writer I think.
 
XD Shooter- you mis read this.

oh, ok. still, I think the eagle and hawk killing was more a religious thing than a way of capturing meat to eat. Those birds look like a turkey, but they have very little meat on them. The raptor center here at the U of MN is very informative, and the largest eagles weight less than 10 pounds.
 
Absolutely- it was for the feathers primarily. THe Mongols to this day catch live adult eagles to hunt with,but I am not sure how.
 
That makes sense, even if just for the fact that it's a lot of time for a hunter/gatherer to spend procuring meat. There are easier ways to secure protein and fat so there must have been another reason (and the eagle was a significant member of the religious pantheon).
 
Back
Top