glockman99
RIP Dann, you were a good guy.
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2000
- Messages
- 21,269
This might be a little long, so please bear with me.
A member of both BladeForums and the other "knife-forum" offered a lens for sale a couple of days ago (on the 2nd). At the "other" knife-forum he was/is asking $50 "OBO" (plus shipping), but here at BladeForums he was/is asking $65 "OBO" (plus shipping). At the "other" forum, I offered to trade him my NIB Camillus/Becker BK-1 Brute (AND a Streamlight Scorpion) for this lens. We had a deal, but when I looked-over the Brute prior to packaging it up to ship this morning, I noticed that this Brute (the knife, not the guy in question
), has pretty darn un-even grind-lines and is as dull as a banana, so I emailed him to let him know that he might not want this BK-1 when he sees it, so we both agreed to cancel this trade...(I could have just shipped this (NIB) BK-1 to him "as-is", but my honesty wouldn't allow that, as I belive in full disclosure). I then offered to buy this lens for the $50 (plus shipping) that he had it listed for sale for (I had to talk my wife into lending me the money), and he refuses to sell it to me at that price.
The thing about this is that I DIDN'T notice that he had also posted this lens listed for sale here at BladeForums until he pointed out to me that he is asking $65 (plus shipping) for it (here at BladeForums). He said that he made a mistake in posting the "wrong" price. If I'd have known about the 2 different prices for the same lens, I'd have questioned him on that, because since I'm a moderator at both forums, it's my business to be nosey and set things right.
My question is...Shouldn't he "be held" to honor the $50 price (plus shipping), since that is the one that I responded to?
(Up-date)...Just a few minutes ago, I received an offer from him where he would sell the lens to me for $65, including shipping, but since shipping should cost about $5, that's still about $10 more that the original $50, plus shipping offer...
Also, please note that this isn't about the fact that I was willing to trade him two items that were (are) worth much more than the $50/$65 that he was/is asking for this lens...It's about 2 different prices, and what is "right".
...Comments?
A member of both BladeForums and the other "knife-forum" offered a lens for sale a couple of days ago (on the 2nd). At the "other" knife-forum he was/is asking $50 "OBO" (plus shipping), but here at BladeForums he was/is asking $65 "OBO" (plus shipping). At the "other" forum, I offered to trade him my NIB Camillus/Becker BK-1 Brute (AND a Streamlight Scorpion) for this lens. We had a deal, but when I looked-over the Brute prior to packaging it up to ship this morning, I noticed that this Brute (the knife, not the guy in question

The thing about this is that I DIDN'T notice that he had also posted this lens listed for sale here at BladeForums until he pointed out to me that he is asking $65 (plus shipping) for it (here at BladeForums). He said that he made a mistake in posting the "wrong" price. If I'd have known about the 2 different prices for the same lens, I'd have questioned him on that, because since I'm a moderator at both forums, it's my business to be nosey and set things right.
My question is...Shouldn't he "be held" to honor the $50 price (plus shipping), since that is the one that I responded to?
(Up-date)...Just a few minutes ago, I received an offer from him where he would sell the lens to me for $65, including shipping, but since shipping should cost about $5, that's still about $10 more that the original $50, plus shipping offer...
Also, please note that this isn't about the fact that I was willing to trade him two items that were (are) worth much more than the $50/$65 that he was/is asking for this lens...It's about 2 different prices, and what is "right".
...Comments?