i have had a wood handled laminated blade #1 for about 8 months now, and have been using it alot. i really like this knife, and it works great. it also seems to be fairly stain resistent for a carbon steel. even after cutting up an apple and leaving the juice on for a few minutes there was no sign of discoloration.
today i got in the mail a basic plastic handled carbon steel mora, the "viking" model. interesting to compare these two.
the viking has a larger handle that is much more hand filling. it has a thinner, wider blade. the tang is fairly short. the sheath is better, and locks the knife in. the viking also has a 6 centimetre ruler on the spine, and a marking showing that the spine is at 90 degrees to the front of the handle.
the #1 measures about 1/8" thick, the viking is closer to 3/32" thick. both feel very sturdy. very little flex in the blade. both take an amazingly sharp edge, easily among the "sharpest knives i own" club.
so far, with some limited test cutting, the viking is an awesome knife. the thinner blade cuts very well and feels very sturdy. i imagine it will bind less in stiff foods like potatos and apples too. the #1 is a poor food prep knife in my opinion because it wedges so badly in hard fruits and veggies.
the sheath is much better designed, especially around the belt loop. it is shaped so that the belt doesn't have to flex the plastic to fit through the slots, and it has a built in reinforcement in case the sheath gets pushed away from the body. it also locks the knife in positively. there is a drain hole that while not a big deal could prevent the sheath from retaining water like i have had happen on my #1 sheath (which resulted in a rusty tip and a new drain hole)
just thought i would share my impressions of this new knife and compare for anyone looking at plastic handled vs wood handled.
today i got in the mail a basic plastic handled carbon steel mora, the "viking" model. interesting to compare these two.
the viking has a larger handle that is much more hand filling. it has a thinner, wider blade. the tang is fairly short. the sheath is better, and locks the knife in. the viking also has a 6 centimetre ruler on the spine, and a marking showing that the spine is at 90 degrees to the front of the handle.
the #1 measures about 1/8" thick, the viking is closer to 3/32" thick. both feel very sturdy. very little flex in the blade. both take an amazingly sharp edge, easily among the "sharpest knives i own" club.
so far, with some limited test cutting, the viking is an awesome knife. the thinner blade cuts very well and feels very sturdy. i imagine it will bind less in stiff foods like potatos and apples too. the #1 is a poor food prep knife in my opinion because it wedges so badly in hard fruits and veggies.
the sheath is much better designed, especially around the belt loop. it is shaped so that the belt doesn't have to flex the plastic to fit through the slots, and it has a built in reinforcement in case the sheath gets pushed away from the body. it also locks the knife in positively. there is a drain hole that while not a big deal could prevent the sheath from retaining water like i have had happen on my #1 sheath (which resulted in a rusty tip and a new drain hole)
just thought i would share my impressions of this new knife and compare for anyone looking at plastic handled vs wood handled.