horseclover
Basic Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2000
- Messages
- 3,527
As we are cross posting and editing at the same time, I'll respond to these additions to your last post seperately.
As to one line replies, I have not followed your history at Blade Forums. It could be said I don't post here a lot. I do tend to reply or post more than one liners that either amount to nothing, or really do need clarification.
I could have as easily replied to the first person mentioning Paul Champagne makes tamahagane.
Cheers
GC
Exactly. It really isn't an issue of being anal about it either. It would not be unlike applying Japanese terminology to all swords everywhere. Kind of silly don't you think?It also depends on if you define Tamahagane as anally close to the japanese ritualistic production, or to smelting steel from iron bearing sand, producing sponge iron or letting the steel actually go molten.
Having done so in my initial post to this thread, I am the recipient of laughter regarding another forum instead of a list which you have now shared to support your initial remark.But Glen, I have to ask why the hostility? And please point out some of the misinfo so I can correct it, as I have often done in the past, as I am by no means an expert on anything, nor do I ever claim to be?
As to one line replies, I have not followed your history at Blade Forums. It could be said I don't post here a lot. I do tend to reply or post more than one liners that either amount to nothing, or really do need clarification.
I could have as easily replied to the first person mentioning Paul Champagne makes tamahagane.
Cheers
GC