- Joined
- Jan 21, 2000
- Messages
- 8,888
A recent thread started me thinking about the history of Busses asymmetrical edge, here:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=715572
Looking back to the days of the Busse Basic line, I recall no one knew much about convex edges back then. I remember an old thread about a Marbles knife with a convex edge, in which the consensus was, "Out of the box it may cut like crazy, but how are you going to sharpen it on a whetstone?"
A few people were just starting to experiment with stropping compounds and sandpaper over mouse pads in 2000, but that was pushing the envelope back then.
Now EVERYBODY convexes their Busse edges, an evolution I think of those early beginnings and the discovery of what convex edges have to offer. Busses asymmetrical edge grind actually one-upped the convex edge by making one side of the edge almost flat, thereby drastically reducing "drag" (friction) on that side of the cut. Anyone who has chopped with a Basic 9 or original SHBM with asymmetrical edge knows what that edge is capable of. I remember Noss testing of a Basic 9 and the surprised tone in his voice as he chopped into a 2x4, remarking that the blade was taking really deep bites.
I think one problem with the asymmetrical edge was that if you dinged the edge beyond normal blunting, you had to know how to restore a convex edge, and back then people didn't know how to do that. The sharpening instructions from Busse (to draw the edge across a ceramic rod with edge trailing) worked fine UNTIL they dinged/rolled the edge, and then they were in a bit of a pickle. And what's the use of having an indestructible blade if you can't ding the edge now and then?
I can't help but wonder what would happen if Jerry began offering the asymmetrical edge again, possibly as an option/alternative to the standard grind? It was definitely ahead of its time back in the 1990s, but now I think it might well receive a welcome worthy of the returning conquering hero.
Thoughts?
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=715572
Looking back to the days of the Busse Basic line, I recall no one knew much about convex edges back then. I remember an old thread about a Marbles knife with a convex edge, in which the consensus was, "Out of the box it may cut like crazy, but how are you going to sharpen it on a whetstone?"
A few people were just starting to experiment with stropping compounds and sandpaper over mouse pads in 2000, but that was pushing the envelope back then.
Now EVERYBODY convexes their Busse edges, an evolution I think of those early beginnings and the discovery of what convex edges have to offer. Busses asymmetrical edge grind actually one-upped the convex edge by making one side of the edge almost flat, thereby drastically reducing "drag" (friction) on that side of the cut. Anyone who has chopped with a Basic 9 or original SHBM with asymmetrical edge knows what that edge is capable of. I remember Noss testing of a Basic 9 and the surprised tone in his voice as he chopped into a 2x4, remarking that the blade was taking really deep bites.
I think one problem with the asymmetrical edge was that if you dinged the edge beyond normal blunting, you had to know how to restore a convex edge, and back then people didn't know how to do that. The sharpening instructions from Busse (to draw the edge across a ceramic rod with edge trailing) worked fine UNTIL they dinged/rolled the edge, and then they were in a bit of a pickle. And what's the use of having an indestructible blade if you can't ding the edge now and then?
I can't help but wonder what would happen if Jerry began offering the asymmetrical edge again, possibly as an option/alternative to the standard grind? It was definitely ahead of its time back in the 1990s, but now I think it might well receive a welcome worthy of the returning conquering hero.
Thoughts?