Nice. Very attractive blade. How do the handles feel on these types of blades? I see keris, parongs, etc. that have seemingly intricate, fragile handles (compared to a khuk) and think they must have a purpose, but they don't look very comfortable.
Thanks for sharing. (I envy your collection)
Shann,
In hand, the handles are very comfortable.
Most Indonesian and peninsular keris were not intended as battle weapons, though they would do serious damage in a thrust.
Keris were mainly talismans. You will see pictures of Indonesians going into battle wearing keris, but they usually did not use them for fighting unless all their other weapons were gone.
The tang is round to make the handle easiliy removable to be able to soak the blade in solutions to clean, etch and or stain. But this means the handle could easiliy come off in battle.
The keris was a symbol of manhood. Most men had one that they got from their father as a coming of age ceremony.
And another that was handed down through generations, called a "pusaka" or heirloom. This was a very important keris that they felt was a conduit to their ancestors for communication and power.
They also considered the keris as a focal point between the invisible (niskala) and the visible (sekala).
At one time it was considered very imporoper, even illegal in some areas, for a Javanese man to be seen in public without his keris.
To me and most people in the Javanese and Balinese keris collecting arena, the blade is by far the most important part of the keris. The "dress" or scabbard and handle is by far secondary. The dress was often changed several times during the life of the man as his place in society changed, financially, politically, age.
Nobles once sent their keris as a stand-in for marriages to second or minor wives.
As you might understand the keris was one of the most important things in an Indonesian man's life. They considered them to have a spirit of their own. Who knows, they may be right!