A lot of good thoughts and input fellas, I appreciate you sharing your thoughts with me. The thing is, with an article in a magazine, no matter how personable you are in word usage and perceived "tone" of the article body, it is still an impersonal exchange with the readers. I have a word and photo limit, so room to only express so many thoughts. I can not be there to answer any questions afterward, nor will I have a lot of opportunities to say "or you could do this" or "and you may want to try...", etc. So I try to have my photos subject to personal interpretation and not have them imply "this is the only way" or "this is the only tool that will work". I want to make people think about how they might approach it with what they had on hand, not just what they should maybe purchase...though sometimes that is a consideration. I want to make it as broadly acceptable as possible for the most people. We here are living proof that many people who have thoughts in common with others, still come from diverse backgrounds, and have different life experiences that define their personal perspectives. A picture is worth a thousand words because each observer will see something a little differently than the person next to them. I like for my photos to speak to as broad a range of people as possible, and if I do it right tell the much of the story even to a person that doesn't even speak the language of the text. You guys have given me lots of good food for thought.
While I get that many, if not most, would be carrying a folder, whether an SAK, a Ti frame-lock, or a multitool, and I do plan on having a multitool involved in this one as well. I just like to take every opportunity to promote the fixed blade as a viable tool, and keep them in a positive light. I think we sure have enough people out their painting them with a negative brush, that those of us who have the opportunities to do so, need to put forth some effort to to offset that. I learned at the age of 7 that I preferred fixed blades in the woods for knife work, mainly out of safety considerations, when my stockman closed on my finger...cutting it to the bone. All folders have the same inherent weakness regardless of locking mechanism. In times of stress or fatigue, I feel a small fixed blade is not only more durable than a folder, but also safer to operate in my opinion.
As for only Fiddleback knives, I worded it that way because this is Andy's forum, and I won't disrespect him by talking too much about knives made by other people. I am at least marginally familiar with the sizes and blade shapes of every knife Andy makes, so giving your thoughts in Fiddleback models tells me essentially how you would be equipped even if not carrying a FB at the time.
Realistically, if it was unexpected, I'd be more likely to have my BK-16 on me than any Fiddleback.
But if I knew I'd be on my own in the woods for a few days and brought a Fiddleback along, it would be my KE Bushie.
Just to throw it out there, don't get me wrong, I love Ethan to pieces, and love my BKs, as well as my Rowen made knives, particularly for my crazy experiments in the woods. As I sit here typing there is a FB Bushcrafter on my belt, and a KE Bushie laying here on my desk. There is also a BK-11 on my desk as well as an old RC-3 and an old RC-6. Along with two Martins, a WAS Bush Adder, a T.M. Hunt Magua, a TOPS HOG, an Ontario Chmera, a DPx HEST, and a a few others. And this is not a dig at collectors... BUT, as much as I love Andy's artistic flare, and his sublime handle contours, if I did I did not feel that Andy's knives could handle anything I need doing as well as any knife out there, I would not spend the money on them, much less carry one pretty much daily.