so i was just looking around at different knives being made by custom makers these days, and noticing that people are copying patterns like the green river skinner and the canadian belt knife...
i am thinking about copying something like the schrade sharpfinger for my own use, since they no longer make them in USA or with what i consider good materials, and i don't know if i would want to hunt a used one down on the bay or anything.
my question is would it be okay ethically to make more of those sharpfinger clones and sell them, clearly marked as copies of course? is it okay for people to copy the green river skinner and canadian belt knife because these have been around for so long and they are fairly universal?
if i felt that it would be okay to copy and sell sharpfingers, would it be possible for me to be taken to court by whoever bought schrade over copyright, even if i didn't call it that? i assume yes, because patterns can be copyrighted and not just names...
so what say you makers (or any non-makers hanging out here)?
i am thinking about copying something like the schrade sharpfinger for my own use, since they no longer make them in USA or with what i consider good materials, and i don't know if i would want to hunt a used one down on the bay or anything.
my question is would it be okay ethically to make more of those sharpfinger clones and sell them, clearly marked as copies of course? is it okay for people to copy the green river skinner and canadian belt knife because these have been around for so long and they are fairly universal?
if i felt that it would be okay to copy and sell sharpfingers, would it be possible for me to be taken to court by whoever bought schrade over copyright, even if i didn't call it that? i assume yes, because patterns can be copyrighted and not just names...
so what say you makers (or any non-makers hanging out here)?