I don't spend much time hundreds of miles away from civilization, so my perspective may be different than some of yours, but I haven't carried a SAK since I got my Leatherman Supertool. In my experience, the blades, saws, screwdrivers, etc., on SAK's have been poor performers, with their only advantage being that they are all attatched. All of the tools on the LM, otoh, are top quality. The blade steel might not be what we expect from our knives, but, carrying knives, the blades on my LM almost never get used. If I were to buy or carry a SAK, I'd get one of those "everything but the kitchen sink" models, and carry that as well when I don't know what I might need. I do carry a tiny SAK on my keychain, w/a blade, flathead/file, scissor, tweezers, & LED (much better than a toothpick IMO). And on that I usually only use the scissors, LED, & tweezers. I see multi-tools as the next step in the development of the SAK, and other than the huge SAK's w/everything in them, multi-tools seem to be much more useful. And with all the talk about wanting locking blades, one-hand openers, & super steel in SAK blades; why would it matter what kind of blade is on the SAK when there are so many good quality folders out there to choose from? It's never a good idea to go out (never mind out in the woods) without a good blade, and I haven't met a SAK or multi-tool with what I'd call a good blade. I'm usually carrying at least 3 good blades on me, would be more out in the bush, and that is in addition to a multi-tool (or SAK). To have a SAK as my only knife would be, to me, unacceptable.
There's my rant, carry on...
------------------
Jason aka medusaoblongata
-----------------------
"To give is a need, to receive is mercy." - Thus Spoke Zarathustra