A tale of three pivots. Dispelling some myths about CRK folders (maybe)

Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
3,195
For starters, this is an opinion piece. I have not done scientific testing to come to my conclusions, and I am totally open and welcome other opinions and dissenting commentary, so 'have-at-er' if you wish. :).

I read often that one of CRK's large folder pivots is stronger than the other (IE "the sebenza 25 is like the 21 with a more robust pivot" etc, or "the umnumzaan is for hard use with it's oversize pivot"). Kiddies, I am here to tell you that all of the pivots on these three models (Lrg 21, 25, Umnumzaan) are exactly the same size (diameter). Although they differ in design, chances are they are in most-ways equal in strength. I might even argue that based on my observations, that the 21 pivot is the strongest of the three. At the moment, I am leaving blade thickness out of this discussion. I agree it is a factor, but whether it's a positive or a negative when it comes to pivot strength is not clear to me.

Let's start with some info about pivots. A large pivot is desirable because it does a few things that come to my mind:

1: The larger diameter will allow less angular deflection of the blade side to side when manufacturing tolerances are held equal to a smaller pivot. This is basic geometry. If a large pivot and a small pivot are both machined such that they allow, say, .05mm of play, the larger pivot will result in less of an angle of deflection on the blade. So big pivots make for truer knives, and give the knife maker some slack when it comes to how tight they need to keep their tolerances. obviously there is a point of diminishing returns, where the blade hole has become so large, that the blade is weakened, so it's a trade-off, but in general "bigger is better".

2: The large pivot has more surface areas for the same amount of force when opening or closing the knife, so will wear down more slowly, and any wear on the pivot will have less affect on blade play and deflection for the reason described in note #1.

3: The larger pivot can hold more lubricant, and perhaps feel smoother as a result. A larger pivot may also slow down a knife for the same reason, but we are talking strength here.

4: Importantly, the larger pivot has a greater area of interface with the slabs of the knife and thus sideways forces are less likely to cause blade deflection as the slabs have greater leverage against the pivot in the larger diameter.

First up: The 21 pivot (bushing)

Here is the myth I would like to dispel: "the 21 has the smallest pivot". The 21 pivot is not the screws! The 21 pivot is the bushing!. Glancing at the outside of a 21 in comparison to a 25 or an Umnumzaan is not the whole story! The screws only serve to sandwich the bushing between the TI slabs and are not part of the rotation of the blade. The 21 bushing is identical in diameter to both the 25 and Umnumzaan pivots, so has similar properties as far as the notes I have listed above. No normal human could shear through the screw and sleeve that pass through the bushing when using the knife, so I feel the strength of the screw and pin sleeve that pass through the bushing is not the greatest factor in this pivots strength. What is very important, in my opinion, is that the 21 bushing is firmly held between the TI slabs (sandwiched), and that those slabs are very rigid due to both the pivot screw and the stop pin screw being so close to the pivot bushing. Unlike the 25 and the Umnumzaan, the 21 bushing is butted up against the inside of the Titanium slabs (the bushing is larger than the screw holes in the slabs). I suppose my point is that unless you think you are going to press so very incredibly hard on your 21 that the blade shears through the bushing screw and sleeve, the 21 bushing pivot is a very strong and robust system, equal or greater in strength to that of the large screw in the 25 and umnumzaan. The ultimate goal of the interface of the slabs and the pivot is not to allow the blade to be torqued to one side or the other. Both the pivot screw and stop pin on a 21 are working to keep the pivot bushing true and square, and preventing deflection of the blade.

Photo of a 21 bushing in a 25 blade
DSCF8696_zps3e807a24.jpg


Photo of a 21 bushing in an Umnumzaan blade

DSCF8697_zpsed774cc2.jpg


Second up: The Umnumzaan Pivot (old style):

Again this pivot is identical in diameter, to both the 21 pivot bushing, and the 25 pivot screw. The primary difference is the the umnumzaan (old style) pivot screw has side bolsters that sit in machined pockets in the slabs. I would argue CRK added these bolsters to make up for a percieved lack of strength due to the Umnumzaan having no stop pin to assist in the "sandwich effect' that the 21 bushing benefits from. In the case of the Umnum, the pivot passes right through the slabs, so it needs something to help prevent sideways deflection of the pivot. The thickness of the TI slabs, resting against the screw in not enough. By adding these wide bolsters to the pivots screws, CRK achieves some torsional stability if the blade is torqued left or right, that otherwise could be provided by the bushing being butted against inside of the Ti slab, like it is on the 21.

Photo of Umnumzaan pivot in a 21 blade
DSCF8693_zps8f352d1f.jpg


Photo of Umnumzaan pivot in a 25 blade
DSCF8692_zpsc504029c.jpg


Third up: The 25 Pivot Screw


Again this pivot is identical in diameter to both the Umnumzaan screw and the 21 bushing. It does not have the large bolsters of the Umnumzaan (old style) pivot, but is protected from sideways torsion by the stop pin holding the slabs rigid. The screws themselves are counter-sunk so they have some of the bolster affect of the Umnumzaan old pivot. If my theories are correct, this would make the 'new pivot' Umnumzaan the weakest pivot of the line-up of CRK large folders (is has small bolsters, and no stop pin), but still likely strong enough for any human's purpose.

25 Pivot in a 21 blade
DSCF8694_zps19e44cc2.jpg


25 Pivot in an Umnumzaan blade:
DSCF8695_zps359eacb0.jpg


A few more pictures:

What was really interesting to me is that the washer are all proprietary to each knife, including the non-locking side washers. In this photo you can see a (left to right) 21, 25, and Umnumzaan washer. I know the 21 has a small washer on one side, and the 25 has the one with the tab, but you would think the other ones would be similar, but they are all unique.
DSCF8700_zpse53c932b.jpg


Here are the three pivot subjects lined up:

DSCF8701_zpsc767d02f.jpg


And here are the knives broken down (note the machined pockets in the Umnumzaan slabs to support the pivot bolsters):

DSCF8699_zps4c0d0bf3.jpg


If you made is this far, I commend you! As Dave would say....."All the best"!
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the presentation. :thumbup:

I agree with your points and don't have much to add really. The pivot while being the "broken" part of a knife is actually very unlikely to fail first or even at all. The blade will bend or snap long before the pivot even becomes bothered by lateral force because of the support it sees from the handle. The lock will also fail in some way before the pivot does, perhaps a slip or crumpling of the lock bar cut out. It is actually quite hard to get good solid force through the pivot alone during use as the load is always shared by the 2 other points of the lock (the stop pin and the lock face). One could argue the the bushing surrounding the smaller pivot seen on the 21 is just part of the blade and actually that pivot is a smaller weaker part. That said, the force needed to shear or even damage either sized pivot is far beyond what a man can do with their hands during normal use so it's a non starter. :)
 
I will say that owing all, and not having your nerve, I am glad to see the "guts". My questions follow. What if any are the known benefits of the older style Zaans vs the newer styles ? I have heard much noise from both sides. I also hear a lot " Chris is a machinist, not a knife maker" .. After seeing this post and feeling the tolerances in my own hands, why is this even a mentioned point ? Simply great photos thanks. Nice to "play" with that much money on the table ?
 
Very interesting thread Cody!! Very cool pictures of the three knives disassembled! I woudld never have the nerve or the skills to even consider doing this! ! And yes.. All the best my friend!
Dave
 
Good write up and photos Cody. I never had more than one of mine apart at a time but thought the pivot hole is the blades looked pretty close in size but never compared them. Also interesting facts about the washers as well, I never gave them much thought.
 
Nice write up KID... Very good thoughts and comparisons you have made here... With all that being said I agree that none of us could actually shear the pivots with out bending or breaking the blade and or lock face first.

Now I will add this.. That the pivot screw on the 25 is larger. So if taken into account it has a higher load/shear strength then the smaller screw of the 21. I think if it were possible to test the lateral strength of each pivot the 25 would take more lateral load then the smaller screw of the 21.
 
Nice write up KID... Very good thoughts and comparisons you have made here... With all that being said I agree that none of us could actually shear the pivots with out bending or breaking the blade and or lock face first.

Now I will add this.. That the pivot screw on the 25 is larger. So if taken into account it has a higher load/shear strength then the smaller screw of the 21. I think if it were possible to test the lateral strength of each pivot the 25 would take more lateral load then the smaller screw of the 21.

Thank you Kwazy, I would agree with you 100% other than the fact that the pivot bushing on the 21 is held rigid inside the slabs, which possibly helps it oppose the lateral forces more than if you had the smaller screw alone. All in all this is just my guesswork and speculation, and I think either of us could be right, and unless the knives were tested to destruction in some calibrated hydraulic press, we'll never know. What my point is is the 21 pivot has more to it's strength than the smaller screw, and it shouldn't be assumed its lighter duty than the other two.
 
An entertaining read for a Sunday. Thank you sir. You've given me a new appreciation and facet of my knives to enjoy. Also, it was a nice break from the (buy knife a or knife b) threads.
 
That really lays it out in black and white, and you can only imagine what Chris' take was as he went through the creative process with all of this in his mind as he brought them to life for us to use and enjoy…. fascinating , and much appreciated!!!
 
I don't understand #1 point (big geometry dummy here). If the pivot is held between the slabs at 90degree, perpendicular, I don't understand how the blade could deflect unless there is some weakness in the handle design that allows shift or movement between the slabs that changes the perpendicular position relationship between the pivot and the slabs.

Of course sloppy machining with loose tolerances would cause deflection but with today's tooling these seems somewhat unlikely.
 
First off, Great job Cody! I really appreciate the breakdown with excellent comparison pics...:D
Second, your explanation of the comparisons helps me understand the differences and allows me to make a more informative decision when buying my next CRK. The Zaan, is the only one I do not own (sorry Dave, maybe you can sell me one of your doubles some day;) ).
So thanks again Cody on a great post me friend :thumbup:
 
Thank you Kwazy, I would agree with you 100% other than the fact that the pivot bushing on the 21 is held rigid inside the slabs, which possibly helps it oppose the lateral forces more than if you had the smaller screw alone. All in all this is just my guesswork and speculation, and I think either of us could be right, and unless the knives were tested to destruction in some calibrated hydraulic press, we'll never know. What my point is is the 21 pivot has more to it's strength than the smaller screw, and it shouldn't be assumed its lighter duty than the other two.

Yes indeed kid... But aren't both held the same way in between the slabs??

Which would only say give more steel around the blade, but not making the screws any stronger. The diameter of the screw gives it more strength. Not the bushing. Which like I said adds more steel around the hole in the blade not giving more strength than the larger diameter screw.

Right...? :D
 
Last edited:
Interesting and educational post,great pics as well, thanks Kidcongo.
 
I noticed that in the last photo (GREAT PHOTOS BTW) that you did not remove the stop pin screw on the 25 any particular reason?
All the best, Dave

For starters, this is an opinion piece. I have not done scientific testing to come to my conclusions, and I am totally open and welcome other opinions and dissenting commentary, so 'have-at-er' if you wish. :).

I read often that one of CRK's large folder pivots is stronger than the other (IE "the sebenza 25 is like the 21 with a more robust pivot" etc, or "the umnumzaan is for hard use with it's oversize pivot"). Kiddies, I am here to tell you that all of the pivots on these three models (Lrg 21, 25, Umnumzaan) are exactly the same size (diameter). Although they differ in design, chances are they are in most-ways equal in strength. I might even argue that based on my observations, that the 21 pivot is the strongest of the three. At the moment, I am leaving blade thickness out of this discussion. I agree it is a factor, but whether it's a positive or a negative when it comes to pivot strength is not clear to me.

Let's start with some info about pivots. A large pivot is desirable because it does a few things that come to my mind:

1: The larger diameter will allow less angular deflection of the blade side to side when manufacturing tolerances are held equal to a smaller pivot. This is basic geometry. If a large pivot and a small pivot are both machined such that they allow, say, .05mm of play, the larger pivot will result in less of an angle of deflection on the blade. So big pivots make for truer knives, and give the knife maker some slack when it comes to how tight they need to keep their tolerances. obviously there is a point of diminishing returns, where the blade hole has become so large, that the blade is weakened, so it's a trade-off, but in general "bigger is better".

2: The large pivot has more surface areas for the same amount of force when opening or closing the knife, so will wear down more slowly, and any wear on the pivot will have less affect on blade play and deflection for the reason described in note #1.

3: The larger pivot can hold more lubricant, and perhaps feel smoother as a result. A larger pivot may also slow down a knife for the same reason, but we are talking strength here.

4: Importantly, the larger pivot has a greater areas of interface with the slabs of the knife and thus sideways forces are less likely to cause blade deflection as the slabs have greater leverage against the pivot in the larger diameter.

First up: The 21 pivot (bushing)

Here is the myth I would like to dispel: "the 21 has the smallest pivot". The 21 pivot is not the screws! The 21 pivot is the bushing!. Glancing at the outside of a 21 in comparison to a 25 or an Umnumzaan is not the whole story! The screws only serve to sandwich the bushing between the TI slabs and are not part of the rotation of the blade. The 21 bushing is identical in diameter to both the 25 and Umnumzaan pivots, so has similar properties as far as the notes I have listed above. No normal human could shear through the screw and sleeve that pass through the bushing when using the knife, so I feel the strength of the screw and pin sleeve that pass through the bushing is not the greatest factor in this pivots strength. What is very important, in my opinion, is that the 21 bushing is firmly held between the TI slabs (sandwiched), and that those slabs are very rigid due to both the pivot screw and the stop pin screw being so close to the pivot bushing. Unlike the 25 and the Umnumzaan, the 21 bushing is butted up against the inside of the Titanium slabs (the bushing is larger than the screw holes in the slabs). I suppose my point is that unless you think you are going to press so very incredibly hard on your 21 that the blade shears through the bushing screw and sleeve, the 21 bushing pivot is a very strong and robust system, equal or greater in strength to that of the large screw in the 25 and umnumzaan. The ultimate goal of the interface of the slabs and the pivot is not to allow the blade to be torqued to one side or the other. Both the pivot screw and stop pin on a 21 are working to keep the pivot bushing true and square, and preventing deflection of the blade.

Photo of a 21 bushing in a 25 blade
DSCF8696_zps3e807a24.jpg


Photo of a 21 bushing in an Umnumzaan blade

DSCF8697_zpsed774cc2.jpg


Second up: The Umnumzaan Pivot (old style):

Again this pivot is identical in diameter, to both the 21 pivot bushing, and the 25 pivot screw. The primary difference is the the umnumzaan (old style) pivot screw has side bolsters that sit in machined pockets in the slabs. I would argue CRK added these bolsters to make up for a percieved lack of strength due to the Umnumzaan having no stop pin to assist in the "sandwich effect' that the 21 bushing benefits from. In the case of the Umnum, the pivot passes right through the slabs, so it needs something to help prevent sideways deflection of the pivot. The thickness of the TI slabs, resting against the screw in not enough. By adding these wide bolsters to the pivots screws, CRK achieves some torsional stability if the blade is torqued left or right, that otherwise could be provided by the bushing being butted against inside of the Ti slab, like it is on the 21.

Photo of Umnumzaan pivot in a 21 blade
DSCF8693_zps8f352d1f.jpg


Photo of Umnumzaan pivot in a 25 blade
DSCF8692_zpsc504029c.jpg


Third up: The 25 Pivot Screw


Again this pivot is identical in diameter to both the Umnumzaan screw and the 21 bushing. It does not have the large bolsters of the Umnumzaan (old style) pivot, but is protected from sideways torsion by the stop pin holding the slabs rigid. The screws themselves are counter-sunk so they have some of the bolster affect of the Umnumzaan old pivot. If my theories are correct, this would make the 'new pivot' Umnumzaan the weakest pivot of the line-up of CRK large folders (is has small bolsters, and no stop pin), but still likely strong enough for any human's purpose.

25 Pivot in a 21 blade
DSCF8694_zps19e44cc2.jpg


25 Pivot in an Umnumzaan blade:
DSCF8695_zps359eacb0.jpg


A few more pictures:

What was really interesting to me is that the washer are all proprietary to each knife, including the non-locking side washers. In this photo you can see a (left to right) 21, 25, and Umnumzaan washer. I know the 21 has a small washer on one side, and the 25 has the one with the tab, but you would think the other ones would be similar, but they are all unique.
DSCF8700_zpse53c932b.jpg


Here are the three pivot subjects lined up:

DSCF8701_zpsc767d02f.jpg


And here are the knives broken down (note the machined pockets in the Umnumzaan slabs to support the pivot bolsters):

DSCF8699_zps4c0d0bf3.jpg


If you made is this far, I commend you! As Dave would say....."All the best"!
 
You are correct Bill but this does not appear to be one of the earlier 25's with the press fit stop pin.. the only reason I say that is it looks like it is a screw head.. and the press fit stop pins did not have a screw head on the lock bar side. But I of course could be wrong.
All the best, Dave

I do not own one but I think the stop pin is pressed in on some of the 25's
 
Back
Top