JT, I'm not sure that A-2 is really suitable for Cryo , that is the formation of eta carbides .Cryo is also typically a slow process , maybe 6 hours. When I was a kid we didn't have much in the way of carving tools but I was wishing for something that would go a bit longer between sharpening ! That was long before I was a metallurgist !
I know in the past the word on the street was cryo for D2 but not for A2. Nathan posted somthing a little while ago about somthing he came across regarding this. And my testing has seamed to fallow the numbers he posted.
"A2 does fine for edge stability (probably better than 3V), but consider your use of cryo and the effect that RA plays on edge stability. There is more RA than we used to believe.
I saw this the other day. From "Heat Treating, Including Steel Heat Treating in the New Millennium" (ASM Heat Treating Society) 2000.
A2 oil quenched from 1775°F had RA 16-18% (as quenched), 64-65HRC.
A single 400°F temper had no change on RA, but reduced hardness to ~60HRC.
A single 1000°F temper reduced RA to levels below X-Ray diffraction detection (<2%), lowering hardness to 56-57HRC.
A2 oil quenched from 1775°F
A -100°F cold treatment was applied to as-quenched sample, reducing A2 RA to 9% raising hardness to 65-66HRC.
A single 400°F temper drop RA in A2 to 4%, hardness 61-62HRC.
A2 oil quenched from 1775°F
immersed in LN for 3 hours, result was RA <2%, 66.5HRC
The problem with RA and possibly converted RA is weakness on a small scale and possibly reduced cohesion with surrounding matrix of converted structures. This is important for fine edge stability. This is low hanging fruit.
So, A2 does pretty well with edge stability, but not "out of the box", you have to process it for edge stability. Cryo is an important part of the equation, as is starting with quality A2. :thumbup:"