52100? Now thats something I do know a little bit about. Along with 5160, it has been my primary steel for the last 10 or so years.
Forging: Compaired with 5160 or plain carbon steels, it is "stiff" under the hammer. The best way I have found to forge it is to begin with hight heat, doing the majority of manipulation during the first few heats. The best blades I have produced have always come from starting high, and reducing the temp of each successive heat, finishing with a very dull red. 52100 benifits greatly from multiple normalizing and annealing.
Heat Treating: In a single type quench/temper 52100 cuts extremely well. The problem there lies in the reduced flexibility this method produces. The only method I use on this steel is the multiple quench (edge hardening) in pre-heated oil, followed by multiple tempering at 375 degrees. (400-425 for a single quenched blade) From this alone, a blade with the proper geometry will eaisly pass the ABS tests, and with sub-zero quench........well, let's just say you probably wouldn't believe my results. I believe that if properly made, and multiple quenched, a blade of 52100 will OVERALL out perform anything else out there. I want to clarify that statement by saying that there may be something that will out cut it, something else that might out tough it, and even something else that might out flex it, but for all those characteristics combined in a single blade, along with ease of sharpening, I'm yet to see anything that can match a well made blade of 52100..............Amen. OK, end of sermon.
http://www.mtn-webtech.com/~caffrey
------------------
Ed Caffrey
"The Montana Bladesmith"
[This message has been edited by Ed Caffrey (edited 23 December 1999).]