Anyone compared these two companies against each other in a head to head? Other than the Mora not being full tang and a steel difference is there anything else holding the Mora back?
Exactly how is the Mora being "Held Back"?
The Mora No. 1 and No. 2 have been in production pretty much unchanged, for over 100 years, and there is still a high demand for them, and all the other models they have. That alone should tell you something.
No, they don't use a "modern super steel".
Why should they? The steel they use, be it the carbon steel, stainless, or their laminated, work just fine. They are easy to sharpen in the field, with no special sharpening stones required. You can even use a smooth river rock, if necessary.
The steel they use is less likely to chip than a newer "super steel", too.
Personally, given a choice between the Adventure Sworn and a Mora, I'd take the Mora.
The real advantages of a Mora far outweigh any preceived "disadvantages", not to mention all the hype on the Adventure Sworn website.
BTW: A knowledgeable woodsman/bushcrafter does
not batton their knife. They use the proper tool
for the job; an axe or hatchet to chop wood, a knife for cutting/slicing, cleaning game and fish, making tent stakes, and so on.
Any knife can break if it is battoned. If you are days out in the wilderness, and you break your knife, what you gonna do? You can't run over to the nearest Walmart or Target and buy another one.