I have been carrying the full size AFCK for 15 years. I have been looking at the Spiderco Military just for the heck of it.
Which do you think is the better knife?
One thing I don't like about the Military is that the liner lock tab (?) is not hidden well. When you grip the knife, you feel it. It seems like it could accidentally release under stress at the wrong angle (self defense). The AFCK hides this better in the handle. The AFCK seems stronger and better lined too.
I like the Spiderco ergonomics better though.
Any opinions?
Dave, these are my exact feelings also. I bought an AFCK in the '90's and loved it. I carried it for a couple of years in the Army till I heard all the fuss about the Military. I decided to sell my AFCK and buy a Military. I liked the handle on the Military slightly better, not much, but slightly; however, I never trusted the liner lock cut out! The AFCK seemed much safer. Whether the Military was less safe or not was not the issue as it seemed less safe to me so I didn't trust it. I sold the Military at the same time Benchmade changed the AFCK enough that it wasn't the same knife. This is one of those times one wishes they hadn't gotten rid of something to get the latest and greatest. It wasn't so.
I wasn't just concerned my that hand would unlock the Military, I was concerned "anything" that touched that large exposed piece of liner could unlock it. If you don't trust your equipment, it's no good to you as a tool, especially in high stress situations.