- Joined
- Dec 2, 2005
- Messages
- 456
After seeing the thread on "Flippers" and some of your opinions, I read something to the extent of, "Using a thumbstud on an assisted-opener is dangerous, and doesn't make sense if there is a flipper available on the same knife."
Given this general statement... why, do I ask, are manufacturers putting the thumbstuds (in my opinion less-functional than say a Spyderco hole) on an AO in the first place? Good example is the Leek - one of the best knives ever produced by ANY knifemaker, yet a thumstud is provided when the AO is obviously the way to go. Is this a back-up method for the models that the AO can be removed, or just a marketing tool to provide more "features." Besides being dangerous, all the knives I've handled are harder to open anyways as opposed to the hole method.
Also, when I've tried to open my dad's Leek with the thumbstud, I almost sent myself to the hospital. Any of you been injured, and how many use the thumbstud on their AO knives?
Curiosity strikes again, any takers?
Ryan
Given this general statement... why, do I ask, are manufacturers putting the thumbstuds (in my opinion less-functional than say a Spyderco hole) on an AO in the first place? Good example is the Leek - one of the best knives ever produced by ANY knifemaker, yet a thumstud is provided when the AO is obviously the way to go. Is this a back-up method for the models that the AO can be removed, or just a marketing tool to provide more "features." Besides being dangerous, all the knives I've handled are harder to open anyways as opposed to the hole method.
Also, when I've tried to open my dad's Leek with the thumbstud, I almost sent myself to the hospital. Any of you been injured, and how many use the thumbstud on their AO knives?
Curiosity strikes again, any takers?
Ryan