I have also been curious for years about the Sebenza and came close to taking the plunge on a classic just recently. But my cautious nature restrained me and now I am seriously researching this knife (as a fellow South African and knife nut, I feel almost obliged to own one).
I have heard many positive comments from Sebbie owners, but the repeated references to edge-holding issues bothers me...
Is this not the primary function of the knife? I appreciate attention to detail and over-engineering as much as the next guy, but if the knife cannot take and hold an edge it is useless to me.
My Chinook II of S30V is sharp as a razor out of the box. So is my Tomcat III of VG-10. Both of these knives cost less than half the price of a Sebenza and they are built like tanks. I cannot justify spending $400 + on a knife if it cannot hold an edge.
What exactly is the problem with the sharpness of the knife? As I understand it, a knife can be shaving sharp (good for impressing people) or field sharp (good for everything else). Is the issue that the knife will not shave hair, because this is just a party trick IMO and not really an issue...
If, however, it gets dull after whittling a piece of hard wood, for example, then I am concerned...
I have a CRK Project I and that is extremely sharp. But it is A2 steel, not stainless, so holds an edge better...
I am truly puzzled by this dilemma.
Mark
My experience has been similar in comparison to my Spydies. In truth, I'd probably get rid of my Seb due to its' shortcomings in performance based on my experiences, but I don't want to sell it only to want to buy another in the future. Great execution, but far from my best real-world cutter.