OK. Okay. Let me flush out my headgear.
Over 1,000 posts and even I am able to follow the link I posted to The Good, The Bad and the Ugly thread in the Exchange Forum. It is obvious when someone hasn't even bothered to visit there.
A Buck user comes to this forum, displaying great photos for proof, with a problem and now is not the time for dithering. And, a day later nothing has changed and some are still complicit with the problem, vendor possibly acting badly, while some wax on about things they blithfully remain ignorant of. The expression "I've fallen and can't get up," helplessness comes to mind (cue the Neil Young song). Perhaps some relish being a part of the problem. It appears that some don't want the facts to be discussed out in the open. Are you associated with the vendor in question?
Why not join the team and come in for the big win? It is entirely encumbent upon the OP whether or not they want to post transaction information to the appropriate venue in order to begin a discussion of the facts. At the very least please consider getting out of the way.
If the OP has provided the UPC to Buck then Buck probably already knows who the vendor is and the item's chain of custody from manufacturer to end user.
Question: Is there a pattern of ethical misconduct by the vendor? Who can vouch for the seller? Was the folder advertised as a blem? Is that advertisement available for inspection (if it was bot from an online auction the original ad might still be available in order to see if "blem" verbage was part of it).
It is work attempting to get answers. Earn it...