They look like nice knives, I like the idea of the neck carrying and of being compact enough to put in a sizeable jacket pocket. Small series, semi-custom (not a unique one-off), scandi grind, micarta handle scales, all pretty standard but from looking at pics it seems well executed (I don't have one, being in Europe that would be difficult I presume, and it would be beyond my financial means, too). But I do notice buckfynn stating that "it's not a bad knife" with a handle that is a little on the small side for him, and that he considers his Jääkäripuukkos 'all around excellent woods knives". The Jääkäripuukkos cost about a third (or a quarter, depending on whose information you get) of the Andaltool. It is a bit of an unfair comparison to put an excellent, affordable but not pretty beater knife up against a nicely finished semi-custom handmade knife. For hard use and dirty work you grab a Terava, a Mora HD or a Hultafors (pry out nails to repair a wire fence or scrape a ten-year old kitchen grease/varnish goo off a bunch of shelves...), not an Andaltool or any other fairly expensive limited-series blade.
I think that one should compare the Andal with say a Bushlore or similar semi-custom, lovingly finished, functional collector's knife.
The tip-down neck carrying that mr Andal promotes is something I like a lot. I usually sling my Mora HD or Terava 140 on a length or paracord diagonally across my chest, baldric style - under my left armpit when not in use, shifted more forward during use. Better when kneeled in cramped spaces and the diagonal sling limits forward dangling of the knife when you lean over. I guess it would be very easy to fit a longer cord on an Andaltool and carry it diagonally as well.
BTW, I'm only reacting here because someone mentioned the Tereva Jääkäripuukko, of which I have three... ;-)