Mike and Purp both make valid points. There are benefits and drawbacks to both. Made in the USA is important, as a thread here a week or so ago proved, but enabling Kershaw to offer a low priced entry level knife into their line is more than likely a tactical business decision. IF the knife is well made, stands up to Kershaw's reputation for offering quality products, and provides their excellent standard of customer support (ie. not having to wait for parts to come from China), it opens up a new demographic of customers for Kershaw. This may/will lead to them becoming knife nuts and therefore looking further into Kershaw's more lucrative production models. Remember, the knives we clamor for most, and are most revered by the majority of us Kershawholics are sprint runs, and don't provide the company with enough profits to pay the light bill in the bathrooms for a month.
Sal recently posted in the spydie forum that their company has made the decision to manufacture more of their line overseas. Does this mean that Spyderco's quality will greatly diminish? Only time will tell, but this decision is a tactical business decision, based upon the best info and projections Sal & Co. can determine at this point.
Just like a fence, there are going to be people on both sides. I do believe Thomas and Co. have given this much thought and feel it is in Kershaw's best interests, or we would not be seeing this new knife brought to production. I, for one, will buy this knife based on Kershaw's reputation, and if it falls apart in a few months, then no more Chinese Kershaws for me. But I will give Kershaw the benefit of the doubt at this point.
As for Fish's comments on blade steel, I've got my own opinion on that. And we all know what opinions are like, so with that disclaimer, here's my feelings on the subject. From a price point, going to a higher quality steel might increase the retail cost of the knife by as little as 5 bucks, I don't know. But having a street price of $ 30 is still higher than $ 25. As for the quality of AUS6 vs. 13C26, I'm no metallurgist, but the Cr content is high enough in the AUS6 (and 440A) to classify it as a true stainless, where the 13C26 cannot be called the same. Perhaps this decision is based on cost, corrosion prevention or both. Again, I defer to Thomas, as he is privy to the information we don't or should have.
So, with this said, I will support Thomas and Kershaw on this endeavor. He's always listened to us, and has tried his best to bring us Kershawholics the knives we request. If this is his attempt to offer a Kershaw to the masses, then I will support this. Look at it this way, if they don't turn a profit, we'll have no more high-end Kershaws to drool over!
Now a quick question to Chip at The Kershaw store...I've seen you lurking in the past few days, and if you're trying to tailor your business to us Kershawholics, then great! Are you a stocking dealer with an agreement with Kershaw or a reseller who must depend upon a larger Kershaw distributor for the availability of your inventory? Thanks for answering these questions, and post more often!
Well, I've offered my take on this subject, and to try to keep the community together rather than create the divide that this issue could do, so I'll sit back now and watch the progress of this post.
Thanks for reading guys,
SPX