1066vik
Gold Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2009
- Messages
- 21,339
The Junglas is not a machete-you are correct. But basic function- chopping, battoning, trail clearance, self defense, and allaround rough use remain the same. The largest machete I use on a regular basis is 15.5 inches, and they do make them as small as 10 (though for some reason it's hard to get hands on... I'd kill for one!) I wouldn't carry both a machete and a Junglas for packing trips, it would make no sense. So, because it would be filling the role as a large blade in combination with the others I own (HI WWII, Jungle Knife, Anapurna Bowie, Trams, Condors, Hibben IV, etc etc etc) all I'm looking for is someone to say "hey, it bites just as deep as my flat ground 12 inch tramontina and is just as easy to maintain", or "hey this blade is too thick to bite as deep as my 14 inch Imacasa and the edge is too hard to sharpen as easily" or "I spent an hour hacking through thorny vines in the northwoods this weekend without joint or muscle fatigue, it performs just as well as my eco-survivor and holds an edge longer". So far I've got one awesome response and I'd really like to hear more...
My Junglas cuts deeper than my 10.5" WWII machete and is as easy to maintain.
It batons better.
It holds its edge better.
Both clear honeysuckle and dogwood bramble well, IMO the Junglas does a better job as a chopper on woody species due to the added mass. (3/16" spine vs 2/16" spine)
The sheath on the Junglas is well worth the extra $40 or so for the added versatility of being able to hang it from a baldric with a pouch for a very compact hunt/fish/PSK type setup.