Medusa, sorry for the colorful language. I realize that you probably did not realize the traps and pitfalls your question created. So let me show you the way down the rabbit hole, Alice. Warning, it's going to get really weird from this point on
There simply is No best steel for knives. And because, as others have pointed out in this thread, the heat-treatment is the Most important part of determining the final physical make up of the steel, it would be theoretically possible to treat all of the steels you mentioned in such a way that 420V might look like the Worst steel.
Assuming optimal (what is that?) heat-treatments, all of the steels you mention will make a great knife.
I love simple carbon steels. They rust, but they take great edges, hold them for a reasonable length of time, and are easy to sharpen. I agree with the comments above about the effect of the extremely high chromium content in most 'stainless' steels changing the grain structure of the steel in a way that reduces toughness, and edge holding.
However, chromium is a strong carbide former. Small amounts of chromium in steels like 52100 (about 0.5% compared to 16% in 440C) actually help make more of the hard martensitic structure that is responsible for cutting.
Until recently, I had a real bias against most stainless steels unless rust prevention was a necessary for a knife's purpose (and it is seldom 'necessary). However, the development of crucible particle metallurgy has changed all that. CPM steels have what would traditionally be considered a ridiculously high carbon content (over 2%). The special techniques used in their making allow very high carbon content with lots of martinsitic structure, and also allow very high chromium content without adversely effecting grain size. Most of the chromium is 'free', not bound up in crystals (grains). A free chromium concentration of greater than about 12% is required to make a steel 'stain-resistant'. Most of the 'excess' carbon gets trapped in hard, small martinsitic crystals.
I really like 420V. But I won't stop buying, using, and enjoying knives made with different 'lesser' steels. If one Only considers performance of a steel as a blade, and ignores stain resistance, then some of the best steels would be: 420V, 5160, and 52100.
All of the steels you mention are great cutlery steels (except for nickel damscus). For large fixed blades you need toughness. For smaller fixed blades and folders, you can get away with a harder (less tough) blade steel, and emphasize edge holding. Many people prefer folders with stain-resistant steels for convenience, not for edge performance.
So there is Always a compromise being made in selection of steels for any particular knife application. Toughness, edge holding, and stain-resistance are all sort of conflicting properties of a blade. Any steel can be heat-treated in a way that will emphasize toughness and flexibility at the expense (normally) of edge holding. You could harden a blade so that it would hold an edge a very long time, but the blade may be too brittle to be useable in the real world.
You can not simply say, this steel is better than that steel. You must understand the different potentials that steels have for use as a knife. Heat-treatment is much more important that the type of steel. The steel (alloy) only allows a certain range of performance. It does not guarantee it. The working properties of any steel are determined by the heat-treatment. Heat-treatment effects the way the different elements in the alloy combine. That in turn determines the physical properties of the blade.
I hope this rambling post helps make it clear why your question is 'difficult' to address.
Paracelsus