Slipjoints= "hair poppers." I want them beyond shaving sharp. They have to fell arm hair effortlessly. Generally, if the slipjoint has more than one blade, one, usually the shorter one, will be as close to a scalpel as I can get it, and the main one will be a little more toothy for general cutting tasks, but still more acutely edged than any locking folder I own.
Locking folders=shaving sharp. I'll trade off initial sharpness for better edge geometry that will allow longer overall working sharpness in a variety of materials. I want these knives to be able to rip through abrasive materials like cardboard or carpet over and over without denting or rolling the edge.
Field bangers=functionally sharp if flat ground. Razor sharp if convex or scandi. Flat ground blades can be honed up in the field to be more sharp than what I call functionally sharp. In a flat ground field knife, I want it to cut adequately, but I also don't want the edge easily dented or rolled from use either. The edge geometry has to be up to an accidental ground strike, batoning into a wood knot, without need for a lengthy session of removing dents and rolls, etc. There are exceptions for dedicated flat or hollow ground field knives like skinners, I am talking about a primary "survival" blade here.
For the convex/scandi grinds, I want them at about razor sharp as the entire blade supports a zero degree edge. However, I don't want the apex thinned out so much that I still encounter minor dents and rolls. The better edge support of the convex and scandi grinds, and the built in sharpening angle for free hand field sharpening, at the expense of ultimate slicing ability due to the increasingly thick blade profile towards the spine, is why I prefer them in the field to flat grinds.
Since in the field I will carry a version of all three, the task at hand will determine which blade is employed.