Originally posted by mnblade
>"Humans have used knives as primary weapons for thousands of years."
======================================
Not being an expert on (or even interested in) the history of combat, I'm not at all qualified to get into this debate. But it seems a lot more likely that humans have used SWORDS as primary weapons (clearly they're both edged weapons, I think there's a distinction between the two).
I'd reckon that, in defense terms, knives have been most often used to MAKE a spear/club/mace/bow or other large weapon. I.E. as a tool to make a weapon, but not in most cases as a primary weapon.
Just food for thought.
Before the advent of metallurgy, cutting tools had to be small... stone makes a great knife, but not sword, it is brittle.
Swords are metal weapons, and yes when carried and where carried I am sure they were, as they are today, preferable to a knife.
But this modern age isnt the first time weapons have been banned, sowrds were banned in many other places, at many other times. Royals and those well to do were also often the only ones who could really afford swords.
A peasant or poor man may very well have only had a simple knife with which he did many tasks, and one of them could have been to kill someone in defense or just anger. A small dagger or knife is a more convenient weapon for a criminal anyway.
The way I look at it is that if there were means to count the actual numbers, knives would rule out, as weapons of opportunity/convenience I think they would be more plentiful that swords, and that would win such "contest". I could be wrong.
Either way let me re-phrase:
Humans have used knives for thousands of years (arguably the knife [cutting tool] is the second tool of man, the hammer [impact tool] being the first.), and I do believe the knife would be one of the more commonly found weapons.