Anyone NOT like khukri's?

Joined
Mar 18, 1999
Messages
9,966
I always feel like I'm in the minority because I don't get the whole khuk thing. I have spent time with several different types (Cold Steel, Ontario, an HI, and a few others) and would always go back to my good ol' Bowie type or other large chopper. I know it's all in preference, but every time someone is looking for a chopper, khukri's are always high on the list. Just wondered if I'm alone in my not liking them?
 
They are too big for my tastes and methods. I would rather carry a smaller knife and a saw for less weight. And a compass, and a whistle, and a firestarter, and . . .

Scott
 
Bolo is my favorite "Large knife " otherwise maybe a 3 inch blade does me just fine.never really developed a like for a Khukri
 
Here too. Mine's on the wall. Just not for me. Guess I like things that can slash, chop and stab:D Or i'm just somewhat traditional in my ways:)
 
I very much like the overall design of the Khuk, and HI seems to have an excellent reputation for quality, but I don't own any. The reason for this is that all of the ones that I've seen are just too big for my tastes.

If HI made a khuk that was 10 - 11 in. from tip to butt I'd probably get one, but I really have no use for something almost two feet long.
 
Fishbulb -

(click image for link)

This is an HI 9" khuk. The only problem with a scaled-down traditional shape khuk is the lack of weight: only 3 - 4oz.

I'm a khuk fan because of the shape, history etc. . . but fully appreciate that perhaps a wire saw, or even folding saw are definate competition. However, from my own side by side tests 1 khukuri (15" Ang Khola)= Axe and mid size knife (14" Gerber axe + 5" bowie)
 
The Khuk is not for everyone. There are many alternatives. I happen to like the smaller lighter HI versions. A 15-16" AK/BAS or 20" Sirupati work well for me. Bigger than that is too much knife.
 
They're not useful for my habits and location. I prefer other knives,
and a hatchet or axe for chopping.

Phil
 
The khukuri is one of the greatest blades ever designed.

You need to hold it, swing it and cut with it in order to appreciate it.

In a life-threatening situation, you will learn quickly how much you depend on it.
 
Bear with me for what will be a long, and might be a rambling post. I promise there will be a point at the end. (If I don't forget it along the way :D )

My father is a talented artist. His childhood dream was to be an animator for Disney, or to illustrate comics. He never persued these dreams. He did collect reprints of his favorite old comics in book form, and books about illustration, animation and other visual art. I grew up reading reprints of comics from the '30s and '40s. These included "Krazy Kat", "Little Orphan Annie", "Popeye" and the beautifully drawn adventure strips such as "Tarzan", "Flash Gordon" and "Prince Valiant". Prince Valiant was my favorite. It sparked my interest in the Arthurian legends and other medieval things in general. I loved anything to do with "knights in armor". Both my parents encouraged reading by their children, and the moment one of us expressed any interest in anything, it was certain that a book on the subject would soon appear. My father bought the formidable tome- A Glossary of the Construction, Decoration and Use of Arms and Armor by Stone. Heavy reading for a ten-year-old, but there were plenty of pictures. :) It was in this book that I first saw images of Khukris, and read about the Ghurkas who wielded them. I was impressed. I eventually wore out the binding of that book. On a birthday in my early teens, my parents gave me my first fixed blade knife- a khukri. Although it was of questionable origin and quality, I loved it and used it as often as I could find a reason. I finally destroyed it doing trail maintenance on my high school's cross-country course. I spent many fruitless years searching for a replacement before I found Ghurka House and HI on this forum. I now own several high quality Khuks, a couple of "show pieces" and a couple of solid "users".

All of that just say this: Our tastes and preferences are usually not determined by exhaustive research, polling data and celebrity testimonials. My devotion to Khuks is as much sentimental as practical. Many others out there may have similar stories of how an axe or hatchet sparked their interest in choppers. An axe may be as good as a khukri, which may be as good as a machete, which may be as good as a big bowie, which may be as good as an axe. The thing is, we don't leave what we know and love for something that is "as good as", it has to better, much better, to make us change our tastes and habits.

Its OK to not get the "Khukri thing". It never hurts to try something new, and if you don't find it significantly better than what you've already got, there's no need to change.*


*For some reason, this philosophy is considered void among the "Glockblock", who consider loyalty to, or tolerance of, any other firearm to be an act of ultimate sacriledge. :D
 
The khukuri makes a good camp knife. But, the better/worse part is a matter of personal taste, and it depends on the kit you are taking with you on the hike. For me, the hatchet was replaced by a camper axe (3/4 size axe) a long time ago; it weighs an extra pound, but, what the camp axe can cut in a single swing might take ten swings with a hatchet.

To each his own.

n2s
 
the large blade and forward slant makes the Kuhkri a little too excessive for my likings... it's a great tool and weapon, but for me, I prefer a tomahawk or hatchet...
 
MelancholyMutt - do you mean they look less agressive, and raise less eyebrows about carrying them?
 
not2sharp :

... a camper axe (3/4 size axe) a long time ago; it weighs an extra pound, but, what the camp axe can cut in a single swing might take ten swings with a hatchet.

A felling axe, will get the same class of penetration as a hatchet, about two inches on clear soft woods. I compared a couple of years ago using results I could get with the GB Wildlife hatchet, and the performance of the top wood choppers in the world, Jason Wynard and company*. Now of course the axes have much broader faces, about twice that of the hatchet so the total cut area (and hence raw chopping power) is about double. There is more to the issue than just raw penetration of course, but the power advantage of axes is not nearly as large as often described on the forums.

As for khukuris being too large, or whatever, khukuris are a very broad class of knives. They range in size and weight from just a few ounces to several pounds, and from a few inches to several feet. There is also a huge difference in a quality one than a cheap wall hanger. Judging khukuris as a whole by the performance on just one blade of a particular type is similar as labeling all knives as dangerous just because some manaic decided that today was the day his gerbil has spoke of when the mailbox must die and his chef's knife was a sacred weapon passed down to him to carry out his holy duty.

Khukuris have advantages and disadvantages due to their shape just as any other blade profile.

*note if you watch a current competition you will note that the axes have increased in size, currently a 7lbs axe is considered light by some. The larger axes, when used by the heaviest hitters in the world, can get power about three times that of the hatchet.

-Cliff
 
I have an HI British Army Service (BAS). I've used it to fell a couple of dead Quaking Aspen in my front yard. It only took about 3-5 strokes to bring down a 2 inch diameter tree. I feel it did the job better than the two other large knives I've owned (makers shall remain anonymous) that had 9-10 inch blades.

However, I don't feel a kuhkri, or any other knife, is the "only knife you'll need." There is a tendency on these and other forums, to try to find the one "best" knife for all purposes. This forces each to subject various knives to a miriad of tasks for which it was never designed. From chopping limbs with a SAK to skinning a trout with an ax. There seems to be an aversion to using the right tool for the right job, actually, trying to find that one tool that will do all jobs. It doesn't exist, although some (like multi-tools) come close to performing in more arenas than others.

My kuhkri is a great chopper and I understand they are used for much more than that in Nepal, but I would like to observe the technique. ...or is it the kuhkri shape that is common to all Nepalese knives, with verious weights and blade lengths/thicknesses? Hard to say without information.

Bruce
 
All have brought up some very good points. One thing I want to point out is I am not condemning the design, not at all. I believe that it has stood the test of time, and serves it's users well. But I personally don't like it. It's funny because I love using large blades, that's why I tried many different khuk's because ya can't get much bigger!
 
Don't know too much about most khukuri models. My 18" AK is a great.

It chops, cuts and splits. Unlike a hatchet or tomahawk, there is no handle shaft to break. Can't throw it though, and it is a little heavier and cumbersome to carry.

I think the khuk is the best hybrid camp tool that one can carry. It won't out chop an ax and it won't out cut a knife, but you get both in one package.
 
The larger axes, when used by the heaviest hitters in the world, can get power about three times that of the hatchet.

Cliff, are you talking about the potential energy of an inert axe head relative to mass? I would suspect that the momentum gained from the leverage of a longer haft would very significantly increase the amount of power generated. Otherwise Paul Bunyon would have carried a little hatchet. :D

n2s
 
Back
Top