nozh2002
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2003
- Messages
- 5,736
You are as well doing profiling - history about bias... This is very I guess universal answer on any valid conserns - no need to bother to explain anything - pull out profile, add label - case closed.
I am not replaying to LorenzoL post - he is in my ignore list.
But here
I allow myself to bold what was seems to me to be reason for concern. Here it is clear that knife sent to warranty can be hold by manufacturer against customer will, with excuse to avoid potential law suit.
This statement bother me and I think some Spyderco representative need to make it clear - is it truth or not.
Thanks, Vassili.
I am not replaying to LorenzoL post - he is in my ignore list.
But here
Yup, the ZDP Mule had a heat-treat problem. The ZDP Lum was a sprint run, so once they sold out, Spyderco couldn't replace the knife. If he sent his in with a problem that couldn't be repaired, and no replacement was available, they would have just given him credit for the MSRP of the knife toward something else rather than send a potential law suit back to him. There was no general recall that I ever heard about, and I follow this stuff fairly closely.
I allow myself to bold what was seems to me to be reason for concern. Here it is clear that knife sent to warranty can be hold by manufacturer against customer will, with excuse to avoid potential law suit.
This statement bother me and I think some Spyderco representative need to make it clear - is it truth or not.
Thanks, Vassili.