I just bought my first Spyderco - a Wharncliff Delica 4 with a K390 blade.
I'm excited to try this blade steel and that's the reason I bought it. However, there's nothing "fancy" about the rest of the knife and when I consider how much it cost, I can't shake the feeling that the fit and finish is a bit disappointing.
Machining marks are present on the blade:
I thought that might be reasonable because K390 is presumably pretty abrasion-resistant, maybe it's hard to work with in mass production... but the backlock isn't make with a super-steel right? Same marks:
Somewhat sharp edges too.
The plastic scales aren't finished any better. Leftover flash/slight misalignment:
Sharp edges in the blade slot:
Clearly the expense of the knife can mostly be blamed on the blade material and the rest of the knife is nothing to write home about... but a $40 Civivi wouldn't have these defects.
I actually did buy a "Spyderco" of sorts before: a Byrd Meadowlark 2. It was terrible. The backlock was stiff and actually had a burr that threatened to cut my thumb, the finger choil had a bump at the end that dug into my skin, the action was gritty and the scales has leftover flash all over.
I took it apart and modified it and I actually enjoy carrying it now (shortened the back spring a touch, leveled and polished the part of the blade where the backlock rides, filed off the bump in the choil, rounded the backlock and polished it, added a deep carry clip and made some custom micarta scales).
Even though I like that Byrd now, I didn't like it at all when I first got it. I assume the real-deal Spyderco would be better, but it seems like I'll be "heavily modifying" this one too.
Despite all that criticism, there are things I love about the knife. The blade geometry is great, it came sharper than most knives do from the factory, it's light... I expect that I will like the knife a LOT once I'm finished tweaking it.
...but shouldn't I expect better from Spyderco? Are all their knives like this?

I'm excited to try this blade steel and that's the reason I bought it. However, there's nothing "fancy" about the rest of the knife and when I consider how much it cost, I can't shake the feeling that the fit and finish is a bit disappointing.
Machining marks are present on the blade:

I thought that might be reasonable because K390 is presumably pretty abrasion-resistant, maybe it's hard to work with in mass production... but the backlock isn't make with a super-steel right? Same marks:

Somewhat sharp edges too.

The plastic scales aren't finished any better. Leftover flash/slight misalignment:

Sharp edges in the blade slot:

Clearly the expense of the knife can mostly be blamed on the blade material and the rest of the knife is nothing to write home about... but a $40 Civivi wouldn't have these defects.
I actually did buy a "Spyderco" of sorts before: a Byrd Meadowlark 2. It was terrible. The backlock was stiff and actually had a burr that threatened to cut my thumb, the finger choil had a bump at the end that dug into my skin, the action was gritty and the scales has leftover flash all over.
I took it apart and modified it and I actually enjoy carrying it now (shortened the back spring a touch, leveled and polished the part of the blade where the backlock rides, filed off the bump in the choil, rounded the backlock and polished it, added a deep carry clip and made some custom micarta scales).

Even though I like that Byrd now, I didn't like it at all when I first got it. I assume the real-deal Spyderco would be better, but it seems like I'll be "heavily modifying" this one too.
Despite all that criticism, there are things I love about the knife. The blade geometry is great, it came sharper than most knives do from the factory, it's light... I expect that I will like the knife a LOT once I'm finished tweaking it.
...but shouldn't I expect better from Spyderco? Are all their knives like this?