Axis lock or compression lock. which do you guys like better?

both are fantastic, I definitely prefer axis though. it's just so fast and smooth and just feels awesome to flip open and shut. it's almost like a toy haha
 
I have to disagree. The Compression lock is actually sort of similar to the Tri-Ad in the way it uses a pin to wedge the blade tang. I don't know if the Axis is as strong, who knows which is more durable, but I would definitely put my money on the Compression lock. It seems to be a lot stronger and less likely to fail and I also think it's more durable/less likely to develop play. I'd be surprised if the Axis was as strong as the Compression but I definitely trust the Compression lock more. On the other hand, the Axis lock is probably stronger than I've always thought it to be. The Compression lock is definitely one of the best designs out there, though. I have a lot of faith in it, especially after seeing the video by Neptune Knives. He abuses so many knives and almost always gets them to fail pretty easily, but the PM2 stood up very well I thought. Even after he got it to fail once, it kept working and continued to resist failing pretty well IIRC. It didn't just fail easily once damaged. It seemed to be harder to fail the second time.

People seem to overlook this design feature in the compression lock... People will toot their horn over the tri-ad but then cast down the comp lock. The "liner lock" of the comp lock is in contact with the tang and the stop pin, so any pressure on the spine of the blade is transferred into the stop pin... just like the tri-ad
 
Which would you guys rather have on your edc? I think the axis lock is easier to use but the compression lock doesn't have the omega spring that could fail...

What do you think?

Edit: can't seem to find out how to add a poll...

It's a good question because you have singled out my two favorite lock types for comparison. My answer is that I prefer an Axis lock when I'm buying a Benchmade and a compression lock when buying a Spyderco:D My office EDC is either a Para 2 or a BM943 so I suppose I have chosen both. In terms of pure strength they both far exceed any reasonable level of need, but I suppose the edge goes to the compression lock in terms of pure simplicity.

The compression lock is a very nice lock , but it's not even close to the strength and durability of the AXIS or the Tri-Ad

You are basing this pronouncement on what objective data? Certainly none I've ever seen published. The mode of failure is relatively the same for both, so to describe the comparison as "not even close" tells me that you really like the Axis lock for some reason and haven't thought about the engineering principles involved in this comparison. You may well be correct about durability (in terms of number of cycles) but I am VERY skeptical of your opinion of the relative strength of the two.

The AXIS lock is 100% usable functional and solid even with one omega spring

The compression lock is usable and functional with none. :)

The correct answer is that if you manage to break either then you've done something really wrong.
 
Last edited:
When all is said and done, my favorite lock is whichever one is on my favorite folder at the time. I don't think either is prone to failing at all and it comes down to what you are comfortable using. I can go either way as long as the rest of the knife is to my standards.
 
Axis lock. Definetly the best in terms of smoothness and having a general quality feel. I love the almost silent yet solid click when the blade locks open.

The compression lock seems stout, but mine feels crude in operation compared to the axis. Mainly due to the stickiness when disengaging (PM2). Also it's awkward to disengage and close with one hand- you have to readjust your grip to free your index finger to push the lock bar aside, then let the blade fall a bit, then readjust your grip again to fully close the blade. It's possible to let the blade fall all the way closed but you have to time it just right, because if you hold the lock bar in too long your finger will stop the blade, and if you let it out too early the lock bar will rub on the tang and stop the blade.

With the axis you just move your thumb up to the post and pull it back, then snap your wrist.

Despite this I still prefer my PM2 over my mini-grip, but it's not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison.
 
I think there is a lot of speculation going on. Both should be very strong though I think the AXIS will be more durable when subjected to hard use. The thin liner of the.compression will peen and deform with heavy use. This shouldn't.cause the lock to fail, but will introduce vertical blade play.

Also, being the tab is so short in the compression lock, and forces transfer through it in a straight line, there should not be much tendency for the lock to slip like a liner/ frame lock like one member suggested. Also, another member suggested an AXIS lock could have multiple stopping points by altering the profile of the blade tang. This is also not true because the blade has to be in contact with the stop pin to lock up, and that can only happen once while opening the blade.

I find the AXIS to be a little easier to use, smoother, ambidexterous, and IMO more durable (even with the dreaded omega springs). The compression lock on the PM2 is close behind it though.
 
AXIS definitely.

The AXIS is smooth and consistent and pleasureable to use every time for me. The one Comp lock that I have is sticky and the blade bounces out slightly 8 times in 10 when one hand closing.
 
Although an AXIS lock has a theoretical weakness in the spring, I have never had one fail on me. The compression lock is certainly simpler, but in practice the AXIS lock has been flawless for me. Still, my favorite knife is my Para-Military 2. If it had an AXIS-type lock, it would be perfect.
 
Compression. The compression lock is smooth and incredibly easy to operate one-handed. I can flip it open and closed in less than a second as easily as an axis lock. I have five compression lock knives and not a one has been sticky. Which one is stronger? I don't know. It's probably a close call but I'd give the compression the edge on simplicity given that it doesn't have a spring that can fail.

It seems like some here think the compression is an upside down liner lock and that couldn't be farther from the truth.
 
Well I like the compression lock just because it is a lot simpler than the AXIS lock and there are less things to go wrong with it. The AXIS lock you can do an easier one handed opening if you pull the lock back and let the blade come out just by its own weight. I also like how with both though you fingers are out of the way of the blade when it closes. They both have their pros and cons but when it comes down to it I personally rather have a compression lock.

I am 100% in this camp too. Compression lock. Don't know why more knives don't use it really.
 
The question in the OP is now moot, as now it is a "Benchmade vs. Spyderco" thread :rolleyes: :grumpy:.
 
Last edited:
The question in the OP is now moot, as now it is a "Benchmade vs. Spyderco" thread :rolleyes: :grumpy:.

That was kinda inevitable since both locks are proprietary designs of their respective companies. Maybe I should read the thread again but I don't see people bashing either.
 
You are basing this pronouncement on what objective data? but I am VERY skeptical of your opinion of the relative strength of the two.

.

I based what I said on facts , facts I gathered from knives which I destroyed during extensive lock testing , and I destroyed quite a few of them .
Some people on this forum love to test super steels and their edge retentions like maniacs , I'm the exact opposite , I don't care about super steels and extreme edge retentions , but I love testing locks to their limits .
I have a series of different test I'm doing on each lock , and in the case of the Compression lock , it failed miserably comparing to the AXIS and Tri-ad .
Compression lock is not even close to the AXIS or the Tri-Ad , in fact , during shock tests the Compression Lock failed even more then some of the liner and frame locks I tested .
The AXIS lock and the Tri-Ad lock on the other hand are extremely strong locks , in fact they are so strong that it is almost impossible to make these two locks fail as the blades and pivots will almost always fail first , and needless to say they passed the shock tests easily .

I really don't care that you or other Spyderco koolaid drinkers in this thread are "VERY skeptical", I'm just calling it like it is .
 
I based what I said on facts , facts I gathered from knives which I destroyed during extensive lock testing , and I destroyed quite a few of them .
Some people on this forum love to test super steels and their edge retentions like maniacs , I'm the exact opposite , I don't care about super steels and extreme edge retentions , but I love testing locks to their limits .
I have a series of different test I'm doing on each lock , and in the case of the Compression lock , it failed miserably comparing to the AXIS and Tri-ad .
Compression lock is not even close to the AXIS or the Tri-Ad , in fact , during shock tests the Compression Lock failed even more then some of the liner and frame locks I tested .
The AXIS lock and the Tri-Ad lock on the other hand are extremely strong locks , in fact they are so strong that it is almost impossible to make these two locks fail as the blades and pivots will almost always fail first , and needless to say they passed the shock tests easily .

I really don't care that you or other Spyderco koolaid drinkers in this thread are "VERY skeptical", I'm just calling it like it is .

Which models of compression lock and Axis lock did you test, and what was the method you used for your shock testing? I would love to see the video of your testing. Can you post some of it to YouTube?

Spyderco president Sal Gleser himself, owner of sophisticated testing equipment, said that frame locks always fail before compression locks. And he sells both.

Koolaid comes in more than one flavor.
 
I based what I said on facts , facts I gathered from knives which I destroyed during extensive lock testing , and I destroyed quite a few of them .
Some people on this forum love to test super steels and their edge retentions like maniacs , I'm the exact opposite , I don't care about super steels and extreme edge retentions , but I love testing locks to their limits .
I have a series of different test I'm doing on each lock , and in the case of the Compression lock , it failed miserably comparing to the AXIS and Tri-ad .
Compression lock is not even close to the AXIS or the Tri-Ad , in fact , during shock tests the Compression Lock failed even more then some of the liner and frame locks I tested .
The AXIS lock and the Tri-Ad lock on the other hand are extremely strong locks , in fact they are so strong that it is almost impossible to make these two locks fail as the blades and pivots will almost always fail first , and needless to say they passed the shock tests easily .

I really don't care that you or other Spyderco koolaid drinkers in this thread are "VERY skeptical", I'm just calling it like it is .

The thread was so civil up until your post. Why'd you go and do that?
 
In terms of ease/pleasure of use, for me, Axis wins. It's just so smooth.

Psychologically, the compression lock inspires more confidence because I can see what it's doing. I like that I can clean and maintain it myself. It's not terribly comfortable to close it though, and it tends to pinch my hand fat when locking open.

In terms of real-world safety both are probably as safe as I could ever conceivably need them to be. In the end I like both a lot.
 
I based what I said on facts , facts I gathered from knives which I destroyed during extensive lock testing , and I destroyed quite a few of them .
Some people on this forum love to test super steels and their edge retentions like maniacs , I'm the exact opposite , I don't care about super steels and extreme edge retentions , but I love testing locks to their limits .
I have a series of different test I'm doing on each lock , and in the case of the Compression lock , it failed miserably comparing to the AXIS and Tri-ad .
Compression lock is not even close to the AXIS or the Tri-Ad , in fact , during shock tests the Compression Lock failed even more then some of the liner and frame locks I tested .
The AXIS lock and the Tri-Ad lock on the other hand are extremely strong locks , in fact they are so strong that it is almost impossible to make these two locks fail as the blades and pivots will almost always fail first , and needless to say they passed the shock tests easily .

I really don't care that you or other Spyderco koolaid drinkers in this thread are "VERY skeptical", I'm just calling it like it is .

I'd really love to see vids of that.
 
Last edited:
I'd take the Axis Lock for strength, I've never had a compression lock but I've tried 'em, havin' been a mechanic all my life the design of the Axis Lock seems less likely to fail.

Add to that the fact that the Compression locl is way more complex than the Axis Lock and in my experience simplicity of design adds to dependability.

Here's a link for the compression lock:

http://faq.customtacticals.com/locking/lock_compression.php

And one for the Axis Lock, courtesy of Custom Tacticals dot com:

http://faq.customtacticals.com/locking/lock_axis.php

Hope this helps.
 
I have to disagree. The Compression lock is actually sort of similar to the Tri-Ad in the way it uses a pin to wedge the blade tang. I don't know if the Axis is as strong, who knows which is more durable, but I would definitely put my money on the Compression lock. It seems to be a lot stronger and less likely to fail and I also think it's more durable/less likely to develop play. I'd be surprised if the Axis was as strong as the Compression but I definitely trust the Compression lock more. On the other hand, the Axis lock is probably stronger than I've always thought it to be. The Compression lock is definitely one of the best designs out there, though. I have a lot of faith in it, especially after seeing the video by Neptune Knives. He abuses so many knives and almost always gets them to fail pretty easily, but the PM2 stood up very well I thought. Even after he got it to fail once, it kept working and continued to resist failing pretty well IIRC. It didn't just fail easily once damaged. It seemed to be harder to fail the second time.

From benchmade tests preformed and results published i know the axis lock can withstand 800lbs of force on the blade, that force going into the spine of the blade. I'm not too sure a compression lock will handle 800lbs on the spine, but i have also seen no such test preformed or documented on the pm2 under similar conditions

but in the end i would trust a life to either lock type.
 
Back
Top