Codger_64
Moderator
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2004
- Messages
- 62,324
HD, reply sent.
It seems there is no real consensus here on pad carry (for the rolled foam ones anyway). Evidently the top or bottom crossways carry isn't as awkward as it appears to me. My experience with that carry was back last century with a cheap external frame pack on the AT. The sleeping bag (heavy by today's standards) was carried the same way and may have been more of my problem than I remember. That was circa 1973.
Inside the pack would be better, but as I said, when I tried it, it just took too much volume in the internal frame 65L pack I was using.
It seems there is no real consensus here on pad carry (for the rolled foam ones anyway). Evidently the top or bottom crossways carry isn't as awkward as it appears to me. My experience with that carry was back last century with a cheap external frame pack on the AT. The sleeping bag (heavy by today's standards) was carried the same way and may have been more of my problem than I remember. That was circa 1973.
Inside the pack would be better, but as I said, when I tried it, it just took too much volume in the internal frame 65L pack I was using.