Jim March
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
- Joined
- Oct 7, 1998
- Messages
- 3,022
Errrr...Bill, that may not work out too well.
These "very ancient" systems including Bando, Kali, some of the Japanese Koryus and others have "subtle little details" going on that can't be expressed by video. In extreme cases you can have two guys standing in the same stance but the "internal stance" is different! It's a combination of "where on your body you're focused", slight balance shifts, even attitude that's not externally visible, and much more.
A good teacher can show you this stuff, help you feel it...but it don't come across completely on a boob tube. You can use videos to home-practice what's going on in a good dojo but...totally replace 'em? No...not if the system is any good.
The good news is, Dr. Gyi is teaching future teachers. It won't die out with him. There seems to be a trend where FMA people cross-train with him but that may be due more to "compatible attitudes" than any stylistic similarities.
Political point: in several states there have been moves made to "regulate" martial arts instructors. This must be fought at all costs. It's worth suffering the existence of a few Ashida Kims. See, the "big name" arts like TKD, Karate, Aikkido, Judo and to a lesser degree the Chinese stuff are "watered down" from their original roots and/or aren't big on weapons training. There's historical reasons for this; China and Korea have a history of major-grade weapons control; in Japan, the "combatives" elements of all the arts were tamed down in the post-Shogun era starting around 1868ish, the year the Bushido were banned from sword carry. In Bando, the FMAs, Indonesian Silat and others the divergence from "true combat roots" was less if it happened at all. So that's one reason any gov't licencing board might discriminate against them; the board will be dominated by the "big names". Problem 2 is that the Japanese in particular tend to view people from Indonesia, the Filipines and Bangladesh/India/Nepal as "lesser people" - yet they've got more "true combat roots" in their systems.
It's a recipe for discrimination, is what it is.
Fight like wild dogs to avoid gov't licensed Dojos or teachers, other than a standard business license perhaps.
Jim
These "very ancient" systems including Bando, Kali, some of the Japanese Koryus and others have "subtle little details" going on that can't be expressed by video. In extreme cases you can have two guys standing in the same stance but the "internal stance" is different! It's a combination of "where on your body you're focused", slight balance shifts, even attitude that's not externally visible, and much more.
A good teacher can show you this stuff, help you feel it...but it don't come across completely on a boob tube. You can use videos to home-practice what's going on in a good dojo but...totally replace 'em? No...not if the system is any good.
The good news is, Dr. Gyi is teaching future teachers. It won't die out with him. There seems to be a trend where FMA people cross-train with him but that may be due more to "compatible attitudes" than any stylistic similarities.
Political point: in several states there have been moves made to "regulate" martial arts instructors. This must be fought at all costs. It's worth suffering the existence of a few Ashida Kims. See, the "big name" arts like TKD, Karate, Aikkido, Judo and to a lesser degree the Chinese stuff are "watered down" from their original roots and/or aren't big on weapons training. There's historical reasons for this; China and Korea have a history of major-grade weapons control; in Japan, the "combatives" elements of all the arts were tamed down in the post-Shogun era starting around 1868ish, the year the Bushido were banned from sword carry. In Bando, the FMAs, Indonesian Silat and others the divergence from "true combat roots" was less if it happened at all. So that's one reason any gov't licencing board might discriminate against them; the board will be dominated by the "big names". Problem 2 is that the Japanese in particular tend to view people from Indonesia, the Filipines and Bangladesh/India/Nepal as "lesser people" - yet they've got more "true combat roots" in their systems.
It's a recipe for discrimination, is what it is.
Fight like wild dogs to avoid gov't licensed Dojos or teachers, other than a standard business license perhaps.
Jim