- Joined
- Mar 21, 2007
- Messages
- 945
I think with the separate toes you would have a little better balance and a better "feel" for whatever you're walking on. . . It probably doesn't make much difference on most surfaces tho.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
The white are condemned to wear shoes since they nailed the feet of their god. That's what say the indians of Amazonia.
dantzk.
........are you ok?
That has to be the most bizarre response I've yet received to any thread I've started.Cheers!![]()
What do you mean by:
If you mean:do you agree? NO.
If you mean: do you feel right? YES.
dantzk.
Bizarre? I rather think it's an interesting point of view which illustrates how a culture is seen from an other one.
I hope to don't hurt any religious sensitivity here.
dantzk.
Not hurting anything, just not making much sense.![]()
Its a knife forum man, talk about knives :thumbup:![]()
Barefooters...Gloves for your feet? That's why i talk about shoes, not about knives. Wilderness and survival skills forum. That's why i talk about a story i heard about wilderness people.
It doesn't make much sense to you... Sorry.
dantzk.
Jesus reference. I got it, but it did seem random.
I don't see the point of having the separate toes, other than novelty. What practical purpose does it serve? Seems the downside would be the chance for blisters and hot spots between your toes, an area that even on barefooters isn't already toughened.
Otherwise, speaking as a barefooter, I think the low ones would be handy to pack as emergency footwear for large gravel, thorns, and other temporary areas where you might want protection, without packing a lot of weight.