- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 1,341
In the close confines of field dressing game, I can most definitely see the utility of the blade shape. The curve in the spine would allow precision when working around bone and such.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
In the close confines of field dressing game, I can most definitely see the utility of the blade shape. The curve in the spine would allow precision when working around bone and such.
The thing to keep in mind is Sears was trekking in the 1880's and living off the land. The Nessmuk was designed as part of a three tool system. The belt axe, a sheath knife and a folder. The "Nessmuk trio". He wrote that his knife was ".. thin in the blade, and handy for skinning, cutting meat, or eating with." There is no evidence in his writings of using it for woodwork or general bushcraft. That's what the folder was for. I can see the utility of the blade for the intended use.
I think so too. He used it for a spatula and a makeshift spoon as well. I reground an Old Hickory skinning knife once (because it was thin) to get a rough idea of where he was going with it. Damn if it's not handy as hell around camp. Modern makers are doing the general profile and calling it a Nessmuk but they are made from thicker stock which defeats most of the purpose of his design.