- Joined
- Aug 8, 2012
- Messages
- 302
Really, really like the new Kimber. If I had my time over I probably would just stick to the Kimber Montana as I feel the performance and weight doesn't justify the increased price tag. The Montana is a great rifle for the money. Also I would use aluminium rings and a lighter scope to make the most of the weight savings. Rifles get heavy when you spend the day walking up and down hills.Congrats on putting some meat in the freezer!
How do you like the new Kimber? Less than 5 pounds, impressive
And finally, what are your thoughts on the Sar3 vs your Cabs?
SAR3 Vs CABS - There is only 50grams between the two which surprised me... The CABS is much more knife considering the weight and they are both very similar in blade thickness. I didn't need the extra inch of blade when butchering, but I would have liked to bring bring the CABS for it's length. The meat is so thick on Sambar that a smaller blade is at a slight disadvantage. I still prefer the CABS as a hunting knife. The one thing the SAR3 does have over the CABS is it's size. It's small and easy to carry with most of the functionality of a bigger blade.