I bought a small Ritter Grip in M390, earlier this year. It's a nice little knife. I love the size, weight, lock & blade shape.
I've owned a number of Benchmades over the years.
I use my knives hard. I work in a custom cabinet shop and do a lot of different construction work in the field. I don't baby my users and I bought this one to be a user.
I don't pry with them (much
) or use them inappropriately, as I have quick access to any tool I want, but I do use them hard and cut, scrape, poke a large variety of materials. Not just cardboard and rope!
The point is, I quickly know the pros, cons and over-all quality of a knife, in real world, hard use situations.
I've been going between the Ritter Grip and a Spyderco Paramilitary 2, with cpm s30v steel. The Para 2 has a more acute bevel than the Ritter. It's the factory edge. The Ritter was re-profiled at 20 a side and polished. I maintain both on a Sharpmaker & strops. Based on this info alone, the Para should dull quicker than the Ritter, right? The Para remains sharp twice as long as the Ritter.. Twice as long! The m390 scratches much more easily too. I think it's too soft.
I've owned a number of Benchmades over the years.
I use my knives hard. I work in a custom cabinet shop and do a lot of different construction work in the field. I don't baby my users and I bought this one to be a user.
I don't pry with them (much

The point is, I quickly know the pros, cons and over-all quality of a knife, in real world, hard use situations.
I've been going between the Ritter Grip and a Spyderco Paramilitary 2, with cpm s30v steel. The Para 2 has a more acute bevel than the Ritter. It's the factory edge. The Ritter was re-profiled at 20 a side and polished. I maintain both on a Sharpmaker & strops. Based on this info alone, the Para should dull quicker than the Ritter, right? The Para remains sharp twice as long as the Ritter.. Twice as long! The m390 scratches much more easily too. I think it's too soft.