But Mannlicher, the new pricing edict Benchmade has enacted will not make them more money. They're simply telling dealers that they can no longer sell to consumers at discounted prices. They're not charging those dealers more for the inventory they buy from BM. This policy does not/can not equate to more money in BM's pocket. It does, however, alienate a large portion of their base customers IMO which could, and probably will, actually end up making them less money.
I don't think any of us would be complaining if BM would've raised prices slightly due to increased production costs, but this simply is not the case. I don't know if they're trying to artificially inflate the value of their brand, or if this is an odd strategy to even the playing field among their retailers, but in the current economy where money is tight it seems like a bad idea, or piss poor timing at the very least.
I agrre with you and Saintly Brees.
I think it was a couple years ago that Cold Steel announced that they were going to be forced to raise their prices across the board due to increased manufacturing costs. That labor, materials, and everything else had been steadily raising and they could no longer remain profitable without increasing their prices
That they had held off as long as they could but had no choice.
They sent out flyer's, e-mails and posted it on their site. Then one day, overnight that $50+ Recon 1 just became a $70+ Recon 1 along with everything else.That's a pretty substantial increase but there didn't seem to be much push back.
I think people understood that the cost of thing's had gone up and they were doing what they had to do to maintain the bottom line and stay in business and the company was up front about it.
This is very different as there is no increase in production costs or profits, at least not claimed byBM.
If they are in fact doing this as suggested to support their B&M dealers, although I think misguided at least it has a hint of nobility to it. If it's just that some "Marketing Guru" or head of the company decided that this was a good time make BM have a "perceived" higher value, or take them to a higher level of value without actually increasing the quality and materials, then that's a harder pill to swallow. At least for me.
Perhaps it's both as Saintly Brees and others suggested but I think they would have been better served doing so incrementally and on future releases. Not with currently in production models that are already on the shelves. Very poor decision in my opinion.
The causal or new buyer may not even notice the difference or even care, but the hardcore base of fans and enthusiasts who have been buying multiple BM knives for years for their use and collections sure do! We are being effected the most and in a big way. We may represent smallest group or share of the market but I have to say their "Statement" was frankly an insult to my inelegance and an affront to all the loyal, long time fans.
My loyalties are not really feeling very appreciated at the moment because of this new policy. It's their company and they can do what they want.
Guess we'll see in a year or so how this all pans out for them.
I doubt it but I hope Benchmade is listening because I think they are in real danger of alienating some of their biggest's supporters and loyal fans. .