Benchmade latch thing

Originally posted by tonyccw
I blame the huge amount of holiday spirits recently consumed for this lapse in judgement.

Now don't be flipping your 49 while enjoying those holiday spirits.:D

Now is just a matter of finding out the spec's of the spring and trying to calculate it's expected life cycle.....:D

That's what I'm woriking on now.:confused:

Mike

P.S. I downloaded the .zip file in my original post, but there was a problem extracting the .mov file. I don't know if any of you had this problem. So, I just have a link to download the .mov file. It took me about 25 minutes just to upload it. So, I'm sure it will take a while to download it too!
:(
 
"the latch head itself is what's holding the handles together."

Well,sort of...

Actually the stress is on the latch`s pivot and the latch`s pivot hole.There is some stress on the latchhead,and,of course, on the body of the handle, but the `signature' Benchmade hollow tube ,two piece, latch-pivot would be the member subject to deflection.

As for the latch spring itself, you would need to measure the force required to `fold' the latch 90 degrees. This is all of the pressure that would be required of the latch spring [almost negligible],and I imagine BKC engineers would specify a spring well within the cycling limit.It is a common mistake to assume that springs have a `shelf-life',indeed if they are understressed and have no inherent manufacturing defects,they should cycle indefinitely.

That latch pivot stress is shared with the two main pivots, and is the sum of force of the beams, or in this case the handles,being deflected.None of this force effects the latch spring in any way.There is a principle,referred to as `creep',that accounts for the fatigue of old Balis,as the soft mass of the handles yields to constant latching pressure-unless,of course,the beams,or handles are made of a spring type metal that is,itself understressed.Heat treated,spring tempered steel answers this description as does most [6al4v = apx. 39 Rc to 41 Rc] titanium.

I am not certain of the Rc hardness of the steels used by Benchmade as bali handles,but again,I would expect the good engineers to have this well sorted.I have noticed a general increase in the quality,and quality control,of Benchmade products across the board for the last few years.Off topic,perhaps,but these improvements may be the result of the employment of those hired-gun, custom knifemakers on the staff.We are certainly seeing more creative use of spring concepts,and it is no secret that McHenry,Osborne,Pardue and Williams have extensive expertise in this field,if you catch my drift.There are also some very dedicated Bali fans on deck,such as Vance Collver,never mind the CEO himself.

Has my "Grammer" been run over by a reindeer?
 
Excellent, another engineer to buttress the technical side of things.
Originally posted by Bud
Actually the stress is on the latch`s pivot and the latch`s pivot hole.
At 25lbs averaged measurement, that's negligible to the SS pins used, or to the 303 SS used in the 49's handles and latch.
As for the latch spring itself, you would need to measure the force required to `fold' the latch 90 degrees. It is a common mistake to assume that springs have a `shelf-life',indeed if they are understressed and have no inherent manufacturing defects,they should cycle indefinitely.
Measued with my analog scale at 8~10ozs. Don't have a digital torque drive to tell you to the exact oz. But no matter how understressed the springs are installed, there will always be metal fatique as it ages, causing it to lose the temperance memory. It will eventually fail.
None of this force effects the latch spring in any way.
Agreed and noted in a followup post.
There is a principle,referred to as `creep',that accounts for the fatigue of old Balis,as the soft mass of the handles yields to constant latching pressure-unless,of course,the beams,or handles are made of a spring type metal that is,itself understressed.Heat treated,spring tempered steel answers this description as does most [6al4v = apx. 39 Rc to 41 Rc] titanium.
I have to disagree. "Creep" will not come into play, as there are other causes of the "fatigue" of the old SS balisong of old. Primarily cause is the compression of the tang pin and the wear of the tang pin cup. When those two elements wear out (and they will wear out way before creep can come into play) the angle of tension that was originally exerted on the two beams are significantly reduced.
I am not certain of the Rc hardness of the steels used by Benchmade as bali handles,but again,I would expect the good engineers to have this well sorted.There are also some very dedicated Bali fans on deck,such as Vance Collver,never mind the CEO himself.
Testing on the old ones I had way way back when I was in college, if my memory can still be trusted, showed a RC in the high 40's for the SS handles. And while Vance and Les have done phenomenonal advances towards the modern BM bali, there's a small group of people behind Les and before Vance that should also be acknowledged.
Has my "Grammer" been run over by a reindeer?
Yes, but you still seem to have an erratic space bar.
 
Perhaps we should qualify;

"no matter how understressed the springs are installed, there will always be metal fatique as it ages, causing it to lose the temperance memory. It will eventually fail."

Castles made of sand...I have, in my collection, several folding knives over 100 years old that still walk and talk.I have motorcycle suspension components, over 80 years old, that still function quite well.Dust to dust, and all that,I observe that careful design and constuction can often result in producing mechanisms that will out last the lifespan of any human being.I have examined Scottish lock-work in the National Museum[of Scotland] that originates from the late 1700`s-still in working order.Well made clocks come to mind as well. "Eventually" is a strong word to use in this context.You are right in alluding to the fact that nothing lasts forever,but certainly you must admit that modern metallurgy can deliver fantastic results,no?

" "Creep" will not come into play, as there are other causes of the "fatigue" of the old SS balisong of old. Primarily cause is the compression of the tang pin and the wear of the tang pin cup. When those two elements wear out (and they will wear out way before creep can come into play) the angle of tension that was originally exerted on the two beams are significantly reduced."

Yes and no again.You are correct in regard to the compression of the pin and the subsequent `coining' effect on the handles-I had overlooked that.I was considering the long term effects of storing the knife in the closed and locked position[I believe we discussed this earlier,or perhaps, someone did],where creep would indeed effect the lay of the knife.I have some rather old hand made brass ones that are clearly splayed on the beam.Perhaps they were stowed away in a duffle during a long Pacific crossing.

I do know that some of the `stainless' steels now in use commercially are not hardened,especially on some,if not all, of the less expensive clones that are so rampant right now.A high 40`s Rc is NOT attainable by a surprising array of stainless alloys,inc. the entire 300 series[unless work hardened to the point of fatigue],and a significant amount of the lower carbon 400 series,ie;410 and 416 will barely reach the low 40`sRc.Too often,heat treatment gets skipped on non-blade applications, a most unfortunate situation for the end user.

To get back on topic, I am curious to see how the new Benchmade knives will fare in view of this curious latch arraingment.I now seem to grasp the workings of this system, and I am not in the least concerned as to how long that little spring will last. I suspect the knives will prove to be of excellent quality, but I do believe that they should definately be stored with the latch disengaged, at least for longer term storage.

And ,yes, I seem to recall wasting some of my youth in an "erratic space bar", too!
 
Originally posted by Bud
"Eventually" is a strong word to use in this context.You are right in alluding to the fact that nothing lasts forever,but certainly you must admit that modern metallurgy can deliver fantastic results,no?
Actually I was contesting the "cycle indefinitely" remark. And yes, as any current knife nut would attest, modern metallugy has come a long way from the days of yore. But from my collection of little things, I have seen automatics with similar spring loads fail after less than a year of general use, even if stored in the proper condition. And in most of the old clocks, you would rarely find the original springs (coiled winding springs notwithstanding), since spring tension inconsistencies was the main reason for moving to gears and escapements.
I have some rather old hand made brass ones that are clearly splayed on the beam.
I guess here's where your logic confused me. On one hand you're expounding the virtues of modern metallurgy, yet on the other, you're citing an example of a inherent weakness in design based on something old, and of different materials than what is being discussed (Ss handle material).
I now seem to grasp the workings of this system, and I am not in the least concerned as to how long that little spring will last. I suspect the knives will prove to be of excellent quality, but I do believe that they should definately be stored with the latch disengaged, at least for longer term storage.
I too would like to see the new spring mechanism on something besides the 49's. I know the 49's are of excellent quality, otherwise I wouldn't have bought a 4th. On storage, we agree, as you'll see in my post from 11/12/01:
Originally posted by tonyccw
Also, because the spring is in the compressed state when the latch is protruding from the safe handle, I'll be storing my 49-01's with the latch in that position.
And now that I know the pressure is only 8~10oz, I'll retract my statement to now expand my original estimate of the duration of the spring's usefulness to be beyond 1 year. But unlike most other bali collectors, I reserve final judgement until we see the design in use. Empirical data what I'm after; just how long will those springs last. I'll wait however long it would take to find out. Though in the meantime, there is nothing wrong with conjecture.
 
"How hard do you think a stainless steel handle should be?"

It should be at spring temper for this application,and that would vary somewhat according to what alloy was chosen.


Tony,we are mostly in agreement.I would like to point out that the stop pin and its` coining effect does not come into play when the knife is in the `locked closed' position,hence my concern with `creep'.I think, with this mechanism, whether the Bali is stored open or closed, the latch should obviously be left at rest.I am sure you will agree on this point.

Sorry about the temporal anomaly, I do tend to surf through the years in my quests. In regard to cycles and time, if it lasts longer than your lifetime , what do you care?

BTW, spring failure on small diameter wire springs can often be caused by other factors than overstressing, ie; flaws/micro pitting in the melt,cold bending, and improper loading-by that we mean coil binding or stack collapse. Any coil type spring needs to remain in a slightly preloaded state to perform. It is the complete relaxation of the spring that allows rebounding, tantamount to bending it the other way.This geatly increases fatigue and /or work hardening.


Reliable spring steel hasn`t been with us since the beginning of time, I believe it was developed in Scotland [again!] in the late 1700`s [I will delve into this] and was instrumental in launching the Industrial Revolution. We have since come a very long way in the manufacture of temperable materials but some of the surviving early work is remakable in its' longevity. We still are capable of making mistakes, however!

Bud
 
Originally posted by Bud
It should be at spring temper for this application,and that would vary somewhat according to what alloy was chosen.
Let's say 420SS, with the intent of being used as a sandwich construction balisong handle, but using two tang pins, hoping to get the RC somewhere in the mid 40's or a little higher. I'm curious in your assessment as well.
Tony,we are mostly in agreement.I would like to point out that the stop pin and its` coining effect does not come into play when the knife is in the `locked closed' position,hence my concern with `creep'.
I concur. But you do know that not all balisong are made the BM way with only one tang pin? This statement would not be accurate in a double tang pin construction. Besides, creep would not again become a factor as the wear of the kick hitting the inner walls of the channel would be more of a concern. But in temporal terms, we are talking beyond a lifetime.
In regard to cycles and time, if it lasts longer than your lifetime , what do you care?
Nothing at all, if all goes according to design, and the design is flawless. However, not everything goes according to design, and not all designs are flawless. While I have never had a SS handle from a BM/PC custom bali fail on me, I broken the pivot pins, and several sets of handle inserts. And while SS channel handles are exceptional strong, and light years ahead of the brass u-channel method of old, they still suffer from tang fork expansion from usage. I care because they still haven't made a perfect bali, and that is my quest. A portion of the bali design may exceed my lifetime, but if it fails in part, then in my eyes, it failed as a whole, and it's back to the drawing board.
BTW, spring failure on small diameter wire springs can often be caused by other factors than overstressing, ie; flaws/micro pitting in the melt,cold bending, and improper loading-by that we mean coil binding or stack collapse. This geatly increases fatigue and /or work hardening.
Exactly the conditions that have yet to be tried and tested in field use on the new BM spring latchgate. Which is why until the data is in, I'll reserve judgement. We just don;t know yet how they will do, and unfortunately all we can do is based our conjectures on our past common experiences.
Reliable spring steel hasn`t been with us since the beginning of time, I believe it was developed in Scotland [again!] in the late 1700`s [I will delve into this] and was instrumental in launching the Industrial Revolution.
If I'm not mistaken, John Harrison's timekeeper had steel springs in it's design, and that's the mid 1700's. Which means steel springs would probably have some level of existence prior to that.

Soapbox time (ignore if you don't like rantings): Bud, this forum is not like that of BM. We are very dedicated to the art of the balisong. Some of us are fairly new to this, but there are several among us that, if you combined their mutually exclusive experiences, can cite PC/BM bali's history from the beginning, because we lived through those years as customers. You've entered into an extended circle of friends that share a common bond: the love of the balisong knife. The reasons how, why and what we love about it is irrelevant. All that we ask it that you maintain the harmony. I know it's hard to know where you fit right away, but that's a non-issue. We don't have any sort of ranking systems. There are some that many look up to, and others that share little, but when they do, it's still valuable contributions. We jest, we getting snippy, we argue like any one else, but we also forgive and enjoy what this forum provides. Your last few posts in this thread has been very informative, and I know, has bought up some points not often discussed. It's apparent that you have much to offer the group (I can sure use another techie to help out), so, leaving the grammer lessons aside, I look forward to what you are willing to contribute.
 
Thanks,Tony

Yes,I am like a wild man sometimes.

I must confess to being interested in knives as only a part of the mechanical arcana I thrive on. Mechanisms intrigue me.I see you are also,like me, a motorcyclist,good bunch of mechanical stuff at work there,eh?

As to 420 SS,it is about as low as I would consider for this type of application.One of the modern vacumn melt 440c`s would be better suited.

Yes,the tang pin!The solution would be to use two,and of the same metal as the handles ,all tempered to a medium spring pressure.The inherant problem [of coining] of [the pin`s] tangental contact could easily be dealt with by using a swedged square pin.Of course this somewhat complicates construction ,which always raises the cost!

There will never be a `perfect' Bali, but improvements are part of the march of technology.
 
Originally posted by Bud
Mechanisms intrigue me.I see you are also,like me, a motorcyclist,good bunch of mechanical stuff at work there,eh?
Definitely. I blame Robert Prisig, the first time I ever thought of the words "I wonder how that works?", and my mastering the screwdriver when I was 5 so that I could take things apart...
Yes,the tang pin!
Not sure if you read my earlier posts on this topic, but you're quoting me verbatim on this. BTW, don't bring this topic up too often, people cringe when they see those words next to my name... Not sure why;)
There will never be a `perfect' Bali, but improvements are part of the march of technology.
Don't disturb my delusions. There may not be one for everyone, but I'm getting darn close to what would be my version. Of course, my greatest fear is that once I attain it, the next one would be even more perfect...
 
Bud...Tony....you guys rock!

Tony, I never realized you were an Engr. That explains some things..

Bud, I too am a 4 decade MC enthusiast, still love and appreciate the older ones, (ape hangers and shotguns with fishtails forever!)

It's these kinds of exchanges between y'all that makes this place so damn addicting. I have no addiction to the bali itself, as much as learning about them, and getting to hang with guys like you that have so much to offer. Thanks.

And Happy New Year!
 
Tony, Bud,

All this talk about pin failure started me thinking about whether a bali pin takes more or less stress than a folder pin. At first I thought it would take less, since there's two pins to the folder's one, but then I thought that the folder's locking mechanism would be the equivalent of another pin, as far as being the recipient of stress.

But my last thought was that since on a balisong the pins are at the ends of the knife where the folder's pin is essentially a fulcrum, the bali pin's might individually receive less stress than a folder's. These are all probably wrong, but I would be interested to hear on what is actually right. :)
 
Sorry nybble: I already learned my lesson with the Tang pin episode. So, I'll let Bud expound on the virtures of a perfect pivot pin. :D

Seriously, you're pretty spot on with both assessments, and they are not mutually exclusive. But we're carrying this converastion on in the thread: "What a Forum"....

Let me formulate my thoughts and get back to you there.
 
I would be interested to hear on what is actually right.


yes,I`ll bet you would and so would MT,BKC and a host of others!


;)
 
Back
Top