Originally posted by Danimal:
Sounds like most of you are BM fans and are happy with the quality. However, when I read other threads about low quality BMs or bad experiences with them I see post after post that has somebody complaining. Do you think that they just get on a roll with this low quality business, and the thread has turned into a "benchmades suck bandwagon?" Do you think that other high end companies such as Spyderco have the same percentage of "duds" but for some reason there is less hype about it??? I ordered my 705 today.
-Danimal
When Benchmade makes statements like "Held to a Higher Standard" on their web site and also adopt this statement as one of their trademarks they open themselves up to criticism when a dud gets through QC, IMO. If Benchmade is going to be "Held to a Higher Standard" I think it's reasonable to expect end users to bitch and moan when, for example, they receive a knife with an uneven edge grind. Of course, all that's needed to fix the problem is some time with a Lansky or other sharpening device, or time waiting for the knife to get back from Benchmade's customer service. However, why should a person who buys a knife from a company that brags about their CNC machines and manufacturing techniques that achieve nothing short of perfection be satisfied with anything less than perfection? I am not, and do not enjoy regrinding an edge, or sending the knife back to the dealer or to Benchmade.
As far as other manufacturers' QC, I have not had problems with any of my other knives; perhaps it's because Benchmade tends to produce knives that are more complex in design and assembly than the Zytel handled folders from Spyderco or Cold Steel--or maybe Spyderco holds itself to a Higher Standard.
