- Joined
- Dec 6, 2008
- Messages
- 103
The impressions that one is "cheap" compared to the other is exactly that - an impression based on visual examination and value judgement of certain fit and finish items. No one claims what those particular items are and why they are better, though. It's basically a proclamation that Spyderco just did it to suit them - which doesn't mean BM did worse.
I have to agree with tirod. IMHO, there is no quality difference here. Similar, if not the same materials, same steel, etc. What we do have between these two knives is a difference in ergos and style. Which knife is better is up to the individual's preferences.