You've got a bunch of things going on there which are certain to get you such a range of answers as to be almost useless to you.
1] The concept of a survival knife. To many that means a great big tank of a thing. From others you'd likely get the hackneyed phrase the one you have with you. And someone else is bound to advise you that a bucket of Moras is a more cost effective solution.
2] Even if we overcome [1], you've got the diving aspect, and most dedicated dive knives lean toward such a high degree of corrosion resistance they don't make for the best tools on land.
3] Many of the people here lean toward woodcraft and ye olde traditional skills with
survival essentially being a subset of that. Accordingly you'll often see simple steels and pretty handles, scandi grinds and tiny knives exalted for survival. The rational being that they are good for woodcraft, and if your field skills are good, you won't be surviving anything. Ergo, problem solved.
Personally I detest scandis and find that outside big choppers steels with a good degree of corrosion resistance work best. And the concept of a survival knife to me means whatever is living under my left arm, and that is usually something simple, ugly, between 4-6 and starkly practical. I'm not a romantic. Depending on how heavily you are going to load the diving aspect I'd give very strong consideration to the Fällkniven S1. It is in no way a diving knife, but because it is laminated VG-10 and rubber it's pretty darn amphibious. It also happens to be one of the finest knives around for use on land. Given you used an example of a Benchmade CSK I think this has to be your strongest contender for around the same dimensions.
Load up on the diving aspect though and that Fällkniven S1 is going to be as unsuitable as your Benchmade CSK in the dimension stakes, so I'd be looking at a Benchmade Nimravus. I don't own one of these but I've handled them a bunch and they are great. I've recommended them to several people as knives that with a little care can be used for diving, and all bar one has adopted them. Of special note is the sheath that has good lashing points and a thumb lock -
Yeah, the only guy that declined one is a diver I know who is a fanatic. He dives a lot off the coast of Ireland, and said it was just too small and fiddly when he is way down deep, can't see, and has gloves on. He's retained the big soft lump he's been complaining about for ages 'cos it rolls on nylon line rather than cuts it, yet he prefers that lump because he says he is unlikely to drop it, and the sheath has a two part lock that he has greater confidence in when going through kelp beds. I can see his points, he knows more about diving than I ever will, but I still contend that unless you are that hardcore the Nimravus in the right steel [you have choices] is a better tool. As I said, others agree, and on land, despite it's very tactical look that I'm not usually into, it works well and is a very good cutter.
I'm sure others will suggest things very different from these, but these would be mine. I'd be aiming for the S1 first, and if I needed more underwater performance the Nimravus.