evilgreg
Why so serious?
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2012
- Messages
- 4,092
If people want to say the Zero Tolerance collaborations are better built than the Emerson offerings, I can dig it. Zero Tolerance makes a damn fine knife.
The Kershaw collaborations are not nearly as good as the actual Emerson knives.
Smaller pivots, smaller stop pins, lower quality materials, softer screws, and I don't really like the G-10 either.
They are far cheaper though, and are okay as far as knives go.
But they are most definitely not better...not by a long shot.
They are about as good as you'd expect a knife in their price range to be.
Counterpoint: I purchased three of the Kershaw collab knives and none of them had lock stick (0%) or lock failure (0%). I've purchased six Emersons and five of them had lock stick (83%) and one of them, a CQC-7B, had total lock failure (17%). Perhaps my sample size seems too small? One day I handled five or six CQC-7V knives at a huge knife shop at the far end of my state, and 100% of them had lock problems of one sort or another (all had serious lock stick but for the one which made a noise if you pressed on the blade spine with the lock bar noticeably moving). I consider the functionality of the knife's lock to be reasonably important. QED (at least to my satisfaction) Kemerson > Emerson.
FWIW, the three I've kept aren't perfect either. I do sometimes carry two of them (though mostly just the CQC-7V). The good two have annoying but acceptable amounts of lock stick (the 7V has barely any at all, really, just enough to annoy). My Horseman, on the other hand, has lock stick of the variety that once opened it's basically a fixed blade--it's so hard to close that I've solved the problem by not opening it anymore. It's a nice size and shape so I'm considering trying to fix it at some point.