King Grinch:
I think you were meaning Al Green!
I, for one, was interested in the original question, and do not think that there is any reason to think that there was a 'racism' slant to it.
Even if Quiet Priest had started the thread with the secret intent of starting a racial argument, I don't think it was reasonable to infer this from his original post, yet this is what some people did.
e.g. mgeoffriau:
What were you expecting? Some industry-wide bigotry that hinders minority knifemakers? Grow up.
I've been hanging around the forums for a while now, and I usually stay out of these mudslinging matches, usually because I can't be bothered to read EVERY bit of whingeing that goes on. I think that there are some people who deliberately see the worst possible implication in an otherwise innocuous statment.
The reason I've chosen to chime in this time, though, is that I have been disappointed by a couple of people that I otherwise hold in very high regard.
marion david poff wrote:
You see, the most interesting part is this, never, not once, have I ever read a post in this Forum, or any Forum, where someone asked for a racial roll-call. Until your post. Interesting.
With the greatest of respect, I fundamentally disagree with your implication here and I am surprised (having read the reasoning behind your psuedonym 'Eye') that you of all people would have said this. Just because a question has not been asked before doesn't make it irrelevant, impertinent or uninteresting. Remember, some of the greatest advances in science and philosophy have been made by those with the courage to "ask an impertinent question". Not that I think that the original question was impertinent.
The other person is Spark, who shut down the thread and wrote:
I'm going to lock this one down. If someone wants to know about minority knifemakers, they can open another thread. Next time, please phrase it more clearly so that true intent can be easily discerned, without any mistaken assumptions.
I think that you do a great (and sometimes difficult) job and I generally agree with the way that you handle these sorts of matters but, while I don't presume to tell you how to run these forums, I think that closing the thread in this case was the wrong thing to do. Quiet Priest cited heritage and cultural curiosity as the motivation for his question and there are other valid angles of interest for this topic as well, mine being ethinic artistic and design influences. I think that these are both valid reasons for QP to ask his question.
Having read and re-read his original post several times, I think that for you to blame QP's phrasing is unfair. As I said at the beginning of this post, I don't think that inferences relating to racism in the industry can be drawn by any reasonable interpretation of his original words. In any case, even if QP had blatantly stated "I DO NOT THINK THE CUTLERY INDUSTRY IS RACIST, I JUST WANT TO KNOW BECAUSE ...xxx..." in his original question,
someone would still think "...he doth protest too much". And to have to deflect such accusations in your opening post would just be plain awkward, particularly if you don't happen to know whether a question will be taboo since it has never been asked before, as MDP pointed out
I take my hat off to Anthony Cheeseboro, who patently recognised the intent and validity of QP's question and was articulate in expressing so.
Finally (and sorry for the v.long post - not quite 10,000 words, Ken

) in answer to the subject of
this thread:
With the exception of a few volatile people, I have found that BF people are generally very friendly, patient, helpful and informative and that BladeForums is a good place to be. If we all try to behave a little more like Anthony Cheeseboro and a little less like mgeoffriau when these issues arise, then BF will always be so.
Thanks to those of you who read this far...
Dom
p.s. KWM:
I think closing that thread was the right thing to do since it had wandered far from it's original intent. Why some poeple seem to always have to enter a thread to start an argument, and do nothing constuctive, I don't know.
I just previewed my post and the thread was updated with your post. In relation to locking the other thread I can see your point, and although still don't think it was the right thing to do, I am now
less certain that it was the wrong thing...
p.p.s. I don't think that its right to lock this thread, although moving it may be appropriate.