- Joined
- Mar 18, 2006
- Messages
- 520
I've read many things over many years about handguns for BIG (not black bears) bear protection. I have absolutely no experience, having hunted since I was a kid but have never even taken a shot at a bear.
What intrigues me on the subject is the popular chioce of heavy revolvers. First the .44 mag, now .454, .460, .480, and .500 in short barreled versions for handiness. The .44 mag is OK for me but slow to get back on target so those with significantly heaver recoil have to be even slower given the same basic design. Even the writers admit they are on the very edge of controllability with maximum loads.
These big boomers are still behind most rifles considered even marginal for BIG bears, yet the manufacturers even have BIG bear protection touted as a purpose for some of their models. They must be assuming one shot will do the job is the only thing I can deduce.
I can put a half dozen heavy load .45 ACP's reasonably on target in the same time it takes me to put two full power .44 mags even close together. The .45 has about the same penetration as the mag but with less expansion in my personal tests. I'm curious why one shot or so from a 'nasty' revolver rather than several from a .45 semi auto seems to be the popular answer. Interestingly, I can't recall a single article recounting how a BIG handgun was used to stave off a determined BIG bear attack. I would think the idea is to stop a charge, not make a one- shot kill.
Given a choice, I think I would be better off with a BIG cannister of pepper spray made for the purpose, but in a handgun a .45 ACP semi. Has anyone read a verified account or had personal experience? I've always been curious about the subject. Thanks in advance.
Regards, ss.
What intrigues me on the subject is the popular chioce of heavy revolvers. First the .44 mag, now .454, .460, .480, and .500 in short barreled versions for handiness. The .44 mag is OK for me but slow to get back on target so those with significantly heaver recoil have to be even slower given the same basic design. Even the writers admit they are on the very edge of controllability with maximum loads.
These big boomers are still behind most rifles considered even marginal for BIG bears, yet the manufacturers even have BIG bear protection touted as a purpose for some of their models. They must be assuming one shot will do the job is the only thing I can deduce.
I can put a half dozen heavy load .45 ACP's reasonably on target in the same time it takes me to put two full power .44 mags even close together. The .45 has about the same penetration as the mag but with less expansion in my personal tests. I'm curious why one shot or so from a 'nasty' revolver rather than several from a .45 semi auto seems to be the popular answer. Interestingly, I can't recall a single article recounting how a BIG handgun was used to stave off a determined BIG bear attack. I would think the idea is to stop a charge, not make a one- shot kill.
Given a choice, I think I would be better off with a BIG cannister of pepper spray made for the purpose, but in a handgun a .45 ACP semi. Has anyone read a verified account or had personal experience? I've always been curious about the subject. Thanks in advance.